is, of course, Tilt-Only vs. Fully-Articulated LCD screen. (Warning: this is a mini-rant.) My collection of cameras has both represented so my feelings are not as strong as many. However, I was just looking at the DPR comments on the Canon RP body (This thread got me curious: Canon - Anyone Canon RP users here?) an they specifically say " The flip-out articulating screen encourages waist-level shooting, but makes for a wider – and more conspicuous – overall package than a screen that simply tilts." OTOH, in the full review they say: " Articulating screen allows subtle from-the-hip shooting" and specifically list the screen as a "pro". I have no problem with the difference of opinion because it's a legitimate preference depending on the way your shoot. OTOH, DPR will almost always list the lack of a fully-articulating screen as "con" in their cameras reviews. This bias always annoys me because, like it or not, it influences camera makers because many new buyers read these reviews.
I'm done. I feel better. I have some friends coming over latter for some socially-distanced, outdoor beer drinking which I clearly need.
I'm done. I feel better. I have some friends coming over latter for some socially-distanced, outdoor beer drinking which I clearly need.