Recent content by GeraldH

Agreed, the XC 50-230 is a cracking little lens for the money, an XC 200-400 as a lightweight alternative to the XF 100-400 would fly off the shelves I believe. Just my opinion. GeraldH

Indeed, that is the very reason I've never got into DSLR. I'm sure you'll love the lens, it is more than capable of producing some stunning images. I'm just hoping that Fuji will produce a lighter cheaper long lens at some point. GeraldH

But it's like a lead brick! The XC 50-230 is a decent enough lens, surely Fuji can make a good long lens somewhere between these two? GeraldH

Sorry, this lens does not fit with the Fuji experience for me. GeraldH

I have just bought this lens and as good as it is I can't reconcile myself with the weight and size of it. Thinking it'll be returned. GeraldH

Just took delivery of the 100-400, and yes, it is a big heavy lens, for Fuji. But compared to my friend's 400mm Canon lens it's a tiddler! :-) GeraldH

I share your concerns re the 16-55 and 18-135 so the 16 WR is looking favourite at the moment. The 100-400 is a special project lens and is already on order. Bring it on! :-) GeraldH

Hmmm, I have already decided to go for the 100-400 so the only question is whether to go for the 16 WR or the 16-55 WR. I already have the 18-55 so that could be sold to help fund the purchase of the 16-55 so slightly swaying in that direction. What are your thoughts on the 16 WR vs the 16-55...

A standard Summer's day where I live! ;-) GeraldH

How do you get on with the 16-55? Looks big compared to most XF lenses. GeraldH

What happened? Did you sell it? GeraldH

16mm WR on my wish list. GeraldH

First time out with the X-T1 GeraldH

Oh ok then! :-) GeraldH

I did that, it's a long and boring story that I don't really want to debate on this thread. I'm knocking on a bit, reckon an X-T1 will see me out just fine. :-) GeraldH