I rented a 10-24 Mk I a few years ago, and was disappointed in the images. Mine almost all turned out to be not sharp. My disappointment was especially keen since I had traveled to another part of our state to photograph mountains and rivers. The images were not terrible, but not what I had expected, either.
They are very effective cameras in terms of image quality, but they are the Anti-Fuji when it comes to ergs. Hard to beat the size. Genuinely pants pocketable.
They are very effective cameras in terms of image quality, but they are the Anti-Fuji when it comes to ergs. Hard to beat the size. Genuinely pants pocketable.
Tony, I have an RX100 V. What Steve says about the series is true. I find I often use mine as a sophisticated point-and-shoot - because the camera usually gets it right anyway. Occasionally, I'll use aperture or shutter priority. But auto or intelligent auto usually works best.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content and to keep you logged in when you join. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.