Search results for query: *

I do the same.

Dear Fujifilm, I would like to have in the next kaizen firmware upgrade the ability to view the image in whatever mode I choose when using the film simulation bracket option instead of defaulting back to Provia. It would be even better to be able to have a custom setting bracket feature but I...

Hahahahaha! No thanks. It's messing with my tree allergies.

Thank you Don. The pollution was not bad but just enough to give an air quality alert.

The 27mm Mk. 2 seems to be very noisy according to this video. Go to time 10:23.

Maybe we will see some X-Pro3 rebates after the X-E4 is introduced.

https://www.dpreview.com/news/4775177835/fujifilm-releases-very-minor-firmware-updates-for-six-of-its-xf-lenses

After reviewing the test images on Imaging Resource, I am happy to keep my X100F. When I look at the RAW file images, the X100F seems to best the X100V in sharpness and in white balance when comparing those at F8, ISO 200, NR1. Looking at the RAW test images is the key. As Bill Palmer points...

Test images from Imaging Resource. Fujifilm X100V Review - Samples

Ken Wheeler, aka The Angry Photographer, just released a "Pre-Review" on YouTube. He says that the new lens is sharper than the 23mm F 1.4. This is a bit like comparing apples to oranges. My X100F lens is also sharper than the 23mm F 1.4.

An advertisement in my Facebook feed today.

Flexibility plus excellent IQ.

I was thinking the same.

When I up the sharpening in Fuji cameras and shooting B&W, it creates an undesirable effect. Thin black objects will have a white "border" on the side. I am using Silkypix Developer Studio Pro 9 and am very happy with the sharpening options it provides for both RAW and JPG. Here is an example of...

It may depend on whether you are comparing RAW or SOOC JPGs. The in-camera processing of JPG sharpness, IMO, is not nearly as good as post-production sharpening. JPG processing can vary from one model to another, and can vary amongst ICL models and may also vary depending on the lens used. All...

I will ask Jonas Rask to be sure. ;)

I asked this question of a person who has one in the Facebook users group. Another person chimed in and said no - it's like previous models.

If only Fuji would give us a MONOCHROME VERSION!

I stole this from another forum. A source for the image was not mentioned. I checked Fujifilm's MTF charts and the bottom two charts are from the XF23mmF2 R WR.

The newer sensors have a filter that blocks infrared. The X100F allows infrared to pass.

As nice as the X100V is, I've decided to stick with the X100F. Reasons are: 1. I don't care about the lens upgrade. 2. I like the D-Pad and I don't like touchscreens. 3. The X100F will shoot infrared and the X100V won't. 4. If I really need a flippy screen, I have the X-T2. 5. The OLED EVF on...

Camera development up until last year was "vertical" in the sense that IQ was constantly getting better. Camera development now is "horizontal". I've heard that sensors have reached the limits of improvement due to sheer physics so camera improvements now come in the form of bells and whistles...

I know the age feeling. I just turned 69. The X100T is a wonderful camera.

Thanks for the reference to @Leeland Williams. He has some excellent work with the X100T.

Update on specs comparison: https://www.fujirumors.com/fujifilm-x100v-vs-x100f-the-ultimate-specs-comparison/?fbclid=IwAR1abl5O_DEorHp1_wqr5KNhzsX72Rsc-le2xbOCbl9gAcf3SMkmCNgmcPs

I can wait until they are dirt cheap used. The X100F is serving me very well. Plus, I'm hanging on to the X100F and X-T2 for the infrared capabilities. Fuji's quality control sucked on the introduction of the X100F. Initial failure rate was 30% as reported on this forum and from the local camera...

I really feel that Fuji should have made the XPRO 3 eye relief better since they have put the emphasis on shooting with the viewfinder. I'm sure there are a lot of glasses wearers that would like that.

I learned a new word. Thank you. And thanks for the preliminary review.

Good one!

If the X100S is the second iteration of this series and the X100T is third, and the X100F is fourth, what will be the designation for the fifth of the series

Sorry John, It has been over a year since I used it. I currently use SILKYPIX Developer Studio Pro 7.

@Ty S. Thanks for your reply. I've not had a problem with either SilkyPix version.

I have to ask why not use RAW FILE CONVERTER EX 2.0 powered by SILKYPIX on the Fuji web site, or SILKYPIX Developer Studio Pro?

Agreed. I don't have problems with "mushy greens" from my X-T1s, X-T10, or X100T. I use SilkyPix Develper Studio Pro.

Very nice examples so far!

If you like this focal length then you won't regret this lens.

Thanks @flysurfer for the excellently documented and well written technical review.

It's much much better than my early attempts. And, yes, great capture!

I may have posted this in the wrong forum - will duplicate it in News and Rumors.

Read here: Firmware for X-T1 | Fujifilm Global

T0014901_hdr_mode_1a by Lou Tingle, on Flickr

X1T00432_hdr_mode_1a by Lou Tingle, on Flickr

If someone made a hat with a drop-down sun visor on the left side, I would buy it.

Thank you very much Amin. They can be difficult most of the time. I found a location this year at a quarry that works great for the photos.

I prefer the niceties of keeping all gear within the same system, so with a Fuji body my choice would be the XF-60mm.

I personally believe you made the right choice to compliment your 18-135. It is a great landscape lens and I love the extra-wide it achieves for close-up work.

Because of what the charts don't show us. The maximum working distance of the XF-90mm with the MCEX16 attached is about 2 feet. I can cover that and more with the XF-60mm by itself and have more magnification. To shoot dragonflies as I posted above, You generally need a working distance of 5 to...

I don't care for the extension tubes on the 90mm. Here is the latest chart link: Accessories | 富士フイルム Xシリーズ & GFX