Menu
Home
Photography Forums
Buy, Sell & Trade
Featured Photos
Media Gallery
Resources
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Buy & Sell
Buy, Sell & Trade
Completed Transactions
Hot Deals!
Cameraderie Affiliate Vendors!
Support Cameraderie
Affiliate Vendors
Become a subscriber!
Log in
Register
Back
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Cameraderie
, a friendly photography forum,
join now for free!
Home
Forums
Photography Galleries
Color
123°
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pdh" data-source="post: 165548" data-attributes="member: 583"><p>It just is what it is Roger.</p><p></p><p>Sheep sometimes stand still!</p><p></p><p>Also one must allow for the vagaries of human perception - how sharp an image looks on screen or paper viewed from a sensible distance is only very partially dependent on how "sharp" an image "really is" (which is what makes such a nonsense of all the interweb chitchat about lens sharpness and the chimerical "IQ").</p><p></p><p>If I sent you the negative and you put it on a lightbox under a loupe, you'd immediately find that the sheep are far from "sharp". </p><p></p><p>This is one of the reasons I get rather oblique in responding to questions like yours and Mark's, and partly why I've stopped by and large from entering into detailed (or, often, any) discussions about the technical aspects of my photographs. </p><p></p><p>In this case, the most accurate answer to the question "<em>How did you get the sheep so sharp?</em>" is "<em>I didn't</em>"! But that kind of answer is rarely satisfying to the person asking <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/biggrin.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":biggrin:" title="biggrin :biggrin:" data-shortname=":biggrin:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pdh, post: 165548, member: 583"] It just is what it is Roger. Sheep sometimes stand still! Also one must allow for the vagaries of human perception - how sharp an image looks on screen or paper viewed from a sensible distance is only very partially dependent on how "sharp" an image "really is" (which is what makes such a nonsense of all the interweb chitchat about lens sharpness and the chimerical "IQ"). If I sent you the negative and you put it on a lightbox under a loupe, you'd immediately find that the sheep are far from "sharp". This is one of the reasons I get rather oblique in responding to questions like yours and Mark's, and partly why I've stopped by and large from entering into detailed (or, often, any) discussions about the technical aspects of my photographs. In this case, the most accurate answer to the question "[I]How did you get the sheep so sharp?[/I]" is "[I]I didn't[/I]"! But that kind of answer is rarely satisfying to the person asking :biggrin: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Photography Galleries
Color
123°
This site uses cookies to help personalize content and to keep you logged in when you join. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom