WHOOPS! I meant to type 70, should have double checked before I submitted. Can't find a way to fix it. Sorry for any confusion.Aren't these rather like 70 years old?
Fixed!Aren't these rather like 70 years old?
MOST EXCELLENT! But you can bet your Bippie they had studio lights and make up artists for most of those shots.
Totally and utterly mind-blowing. I want me a roll of Kodachrome....though I fear buying an M-Monochrom might be cheaper
It begs the question: will our great grandchildren's generation be able to do the same with our RAW or JPEG files?
Obviously you're not alone mate in having received a high distinction in "Pedant 302" ...there's websites dedicated to correcting ignoramuses like me just on this one turn of phrase. Man, I'm an arts bachelor myself but I suppose with my philosophy double major we were too busy picking the lint out of our belly buttons to apply thought to semantics. Got some seriously good drinking time in and had a riot contemplating our Cogito Ergo Sum, brain in a vat, Buridan's Ass, etc. Oh so many memories.....oh who am I kidding, I lost more brain cells in those 4 years than for the entirety of my existence since - so can't recall squat.1. Please look up "question begging" online somewhere ... it doesn't mean what everyone thinks it means and, as the owner of a "useless liberal arts degree" as well as being a pedantic arse, it pains me to see it misused.
I'll open the bidding at $1.002. Kodachrome: I have a roll of Kodachrome64 in my possession. I imagine it has been sat in someone's loft for about a quarter of a century, and there's about a foot of leader sticking out, so I have no idea whether it's used and been partially rewound, or unused and just lost a few frames. If you really really want some Kodachrome, I will entertain offers of large amounts of cash