emerson
All-Pro
- Location
- Maritimes, eh?
- Name
- David
Many years ago, in a university Art History class, I was taught that art criticism was really about answers to three pertinent questions:
1. What did the artist set out to do?
2. Was it done well?
3. Was it worth doing?
These three questions have served me well when critically examining my own photography, and indirectly in many other aspects of my work and life. In fact, I have yet to find a better approach.
Is there an approach to criticism that you find useful?
1. What did the artist set out to do?
2. Was it done well?
3. Was it worth doing?
These three questions have served me well when critically examining my own photography, and indirectly in many other aspects of my work and life. In fact, I have yet to find a better approach.
Is there an approach to criticism that you find useful?