Leica After work walk, 50mm Jupiter-8 M39

carlb

All-Pro
It was a perfect evening to relax after a long workday. Railroad tracks west of Tony Schmitt park, and woods surrounding. Took three lenses besides the Russian, but the Jupiter-8 stayed on the camera the whole time. Perhaps I was just too tired to switch perspectives.

34735551012_898012052d_b.jpg

up the hill
by Carl B, on Flickr

34088188403_43881a8832_b.jpg

undergrowth sumac
by Carl B, on Flickr

34858564166_984da85070_b.jpg

this old truck
by Carl B, on Flickr

34088155663_8068f1fae8_b.jpg

west going under
by Carl B, on Flickr

34766961041_b0ae6e3e97_b.jpg

white to yellow
by Carl B, on Flickr

34898543265_320c4a67c0_b.jpg

wild mustard
by Carl B, on Flickr

34766950471_1681f00ea2_b.jpg

woods opening to tracks
by Carl B, on Flickr
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Those look great- A good Jupiter-8 matches a Nikkor 5cm f2. This one does. I have four of the Nikkors, two Leica and two S-Mount.
 
Well done, Carl. It is always refreshing and alarming (!) how a low cost lens can deliver beautiful images (with the direct contribution by the photographer, of course), and that it is not required to use a lens that costs $1000+.
 
This may be an inexpensive lens now Raid, but I'd say it took a lot of care to produce these optics back in the day. Coupled with its recent repurposing to Leica mount standards by Brian, we get a chance to see how much potential is in such glass. The result is an unmatched bargain for what this lens has become.

Modern optics have the advantage in coatings of course. I had to be careful and experiment a bit to reduce flare for some of these shots. I should investigate hoods more, but I just don't like their physical presence when shooting. Silly, I know.
 
Yes, this is true, and I value very much such lenses. I will use in an upcoming trip a Zeiss Sonnar 5cm/1.5 ltm (1938) that Brian put together for me.
 
Back
Top