First, there is a difference between HDR done right, and what a lot of people think is HDR. I have taken a lot of time to get the results I do. I won't judge other's work, I just push myself to go farther than most. I find my pictures to be more realistic than a lot of over processed shots posted by many photographers.Call me a curmudgeon, but I have a real issue with HDR. It makes my eyeballs itch. It is unreal in the same way that the pictures on shortbread tins are unreal. A form of cartoonish hyper-reality that bruises the retinas. Like salt in a dish, it should inform, not overwhelm and render the end result unpalatable. Nothing in real life ever looks like this. I think I had best stay out of this thread, for my own sanity.
Shot abandoned buildings. Love HDR, done right. Anyone else?
Call me a curmudgeon, but I have a real issue with HDR. It makes my eyeballs itch. It is unreal in the same way that the pictures on shortbread tins are unreal. A form of cartoonish hyper-reality that bruises the retinas. Like salt in a dish, it should inform, not overwhelm and render the end result unpalatable. Nothing in real life ever looks like this. I think I had best stay out of this thread, for my own sanity.
Call me a curmudgeon, but I have a real issue with HDR. It makes my eyeballs itch. It is unreal in the same way that the pictures on shortbread tins are unreal. A form of cartoonish hyper-reality that bruises the retinas. Like salt in a dish, it should inform, not overwhelm and render the end result unpalatable. Nothing in real life ever looks like this. I think I had best stay out of this thread, for my own sanity.
If you quote me I cannot help but respond - a bit like saying Beetlegoose three times...Sorry, I misunderstood I thought you were staying out of this thread.
If you quote me I cannot help but respond - a bit like saying Beetlegoose three times...