I second the Tamron 28-200 if you can stomach the size. For a standard zoom that lens is very good, and for a superzoom it's brilliant. I own the 28-60, 24-105 G and said Tamron, and from an end result perspective, I've never had to regret taking the 28-200 out instead of the G-lens. It really is that good. What little difference there is can either be mostly edited out and/or mostly only visible while pixel peeping. The 28-60 - OTOH - is nice and small, but optically a bit meh.
The Tamron 70-300 would give more reach, and it's cheap as chips as far as full frame lenses go, but would leave you hauling more lenses.
Good news here is that any of these lenses mentioned is perfectly capable of producing print-worthy images.