Just beware that both cameras are very expensive - and especially the Leica has a mixed reputation for durability or failure, respectively; spare parts are rare, too. So, while I fully understand the fascination with these cameras (I've looked at them myself several times), I'm not sure I'd feel comfortable recommending them. Only the Contax T2 (and T3) command more money, and only the Olympus Stylus Epic (mju II) is more overpriced than either the Leica or the Konica in my book (the Nikon L35AF2 can come close, though).
There are much cheaper options with solid optics. But of course, they don't have the cult status of a Hexar ... which *is* the one to get of the ones mentioned. And they "only" have f/2.8 or f/3.5 lenses - good ones, though.
Just ask yourself what you really want - if you're okay with fully automatic cameras, you have a whole lot of decent choices that command a lot less money. If, however, you want to be able to set things up manually, your options are rather limited, especially if you want a somewhat brighter lens.
Just to mention one particular camera (I could go on for ages here - be warned
): The original Olympus Stylus (mju I) had a somewhat more frugal 35mm f/3.5 lens which nevertheless is a nice enough performer that also focuses pretty close (35cm) and fast; it's a camera that's quite quick to operate on the whole, at least if you don't mind the occasional "flash" surprise (I usually take the time to switch it off) and delivers pleasing results, even though the lens flares quite a bit in certain situations, but it's not as if the faster and much more expensive options won't!
Now, the original Stylus can be had for a considerably less than $100 - whereas you're looking at upwards of $500, maybe close to $1000 for fully working Minilux in good condition; the Hexar may be a bit cheaper, but not by much, and most cheaper ones are decidedly non-mint; this is a plastic camera, after all. A T2 can be well above $1000 (I've seen the Titanium versions go for over $2000), a Stylus Epic/mju II upwards of $300 (sometimes they come up for less - in somewhat "used" condition). Good as those cameras are, that's just ridiculous, especially for the Stylus Epic (the Contax T2 has fantastic build quality, at least). Models with comparable Tessar-type lenses can be found for a lot(!) less - note that the Stylus had a "lesser" three-lens construction, but as I said, it's more than adequate with its own bit of mojo ...
I guess what I'm trying to say is: Don't fall for the cult - or really embrace it; you'll not get "your money's worth" with the more sought-after models. If you're planning on dipping into film (again), a cheaper camera will serve you just as well - and whichever you choose, it'll not be quite as expensive a paperweight when (not: "if") it fails: Those cameras are over 20 years old, often with sufficiently flimsy electronics to make you flinch. The Stylus I bought new back in the day (and which my mother used for a couple of years before she gave it back to me) still works decently. And my much-maligned Leica AF-C1 (the Minolta-made plastic model) delivers pleasing enough images as well - for $30, with the "added bonus" of a tele option (it has a switchable 40mm f/2.8|80mm f/5.6 lens - the 40mm is solid enough, the 80mm is at least usable). Oh, and the flash can be suppressed with a button - nice and straightforward.
Caveat emptor, I guess - the hype's gotten pretty bizarre, that's why I felt I should add my .02c. If you're okay with overpaying just for the fun of it, forget what I said ...
M.