Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MoonMind" data-source="post: 252544" data-attributes="member: 5637">If you don't care about an EVF, I think that the LX10 is otherwise a very good choice if size is the most important thing. I'd try to handle the camera first if I were you: though; I found it to be extremely slippery even though the shape of the &quot;grip&quot; looks nice - it's even worse than the latest 1&quot; TZ/ZS series cameras because it's slimmer. That said, the RX100 series is not much better in that regard.There's also another point I'd check thoroughly first: From what I've read, the LX10's startup time is *very* slow - if you found the LX100 sluggish (I'm not sure if you did), this'll probably feel worse.Anyway, have you considered the Canon G7X II? The lens gets mixed reviews, but I still find that camera the most well-rounded offer in 1&quot; pocketable land - it handles quite well for its size, feels more secure in the hand, and even if the 100mm setting is a bit softer than one might wish for, it's useful to have, especially since it's f/2.8 ...Anyhow, the LX10 has a lot going for it, and I can see why you'd pick it over the Sony or Canon offerings.M.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MoonMind, post: 252544, member: 5637"] If you don't care about an EVF, I think that the LX10 is otherwise a very good choice if size is the most important thing. I'd try to handle the camera first if I were you: though; I found it to be extremely slippery even though the shape of the "grip" looks nice - it's even worse than the latest 1" TZ/ZS series cameras because it's slimmer. That said, the RX100 series is not much better in that regard. There's also another point I'd check thoroughly first: From what I've read, the LX10's startup time is *very* slow - if you found the LX100 sluggish (I'm not sure if you did), this'll probably feel worse. Anyway, have you considered the Canon G7X II? The lens gets mixed reviews, but I still find that camera the most well-rounded offer in 1" pocketable land - it handles quite well for its size, feels more secure in the hand, and even if the 100mm setting is a bit softer than one might wish for, it's useful to have, especially since it's f/2.8 ... Anyhow, the LX10 has a lot going for it, and I can see why you'd pick it over the Sony or Canon offerings. M. [/QUOTE]

Verification