Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="davidzvi" data-source="post: 252554" data-attributes="member: 5899">Yes I did find the LX100 a bit slow, it's one of the reasons I'm hesitating.&nbsp; It also has me debating selling off my X70.&nbsp; I enjoyed using it on my vacation to Portland and Seattle last year.&nbsp; The combination of the wide converter and Digital TC worked well enough.&nbsp; But my GX85 + 7-14 &amp; 12-32 probably would have worked just as well and fit in the same sized bag.For either the Panasonic or Sony I'd add one of the rubber grips.&nbsp; There's a guy on DPR that has an LX and modified the Rubber RX grip to cover the excuse of a grip the LX has.&nbsp; Yes the Canon's 100mm might be handy but the softer lens and an easy add on grip will probably even out most of the handling issues.One of my biggest concerns about getting any of these is the power zoom, a super power zoom probably wouldn't be a good idea.&nbsp; Also the it's only touch, not tilting touch.&nbsp; But the grp does look a little better.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="davidzvi, post: 252554, member: 5899"] Yes I did find the LX100 a bit slow, it's one of the reasons I'm hesitating. It also has me debating selling off my X70. I enjoyed using it on my vacation to Portland and Seattle last year. The combination of the wide converter and Digital TC worked well enough. But my GX85 + 7-14 & 12-32 probably would have worked just as well and fit in the same sized bag. For either the Panasonic or Sony I'd add one of the rubber grips. There's a guy on DPR that has an LX and modified the Rubber RX grip to cover the excuse of a grip the LX has. Yes the Canon's 100mm might be handy but the softer lens and an easy add on grip will probably even out most of the handling issues. One of my biggest concerns about getting any of these is the power zoom, a super power zoom probably wouldn't be a good idea. Also the it's only touch, not tilting touch. But the grp does look a little better. [/QUOTE]

Verification