- Location
- Switzerland
- Name
- Matt
- Start Date
- Oct 15, 2020
- End Date
- Oct 15, 2020
The fourth of the prepared threads - due on Thursday.
Researching this was quite fun ... Though going back to Caesium seemed a bit cheap, in spite of Chernobyl and radioactive boar in the Swiss Alps this year.
However, 137 as a number is apparently huge in cosmology; hence this:
So, maybe the answer's not 42, but 137 (or pretty close ...).
M.
Researching this was quite fun ... Though going back to Caesium seemed a bit cheap, in spite of Chernobyl and radioactive boar in the Swiss Alps this year.
However, 137 as a number is apparently huge in cosmology; hence this:
So, maybe the answer's not 42, but 137 (or pretty close ...).
M.
Last edited: