Uhm ...
Okay, two pieces of information - first and foremost, this is from the M10 with the 7Artisans 35mm f/2! The one in the "Landscape" thread is from the Laowa ... I actually played with the similarity of the two images (the path is the same, but I'm in completely different positions); furthermore, the two lenses have a surprisingly similar signature (which I think is quite intriguing), and I do process my images to look pretty consistent, even though I adjust settings to suit the image (and, of course, my preferences). I think it's a testament to the strenghts of the Laowa (and, agreed, the GX9) that the image coming from my much more frugal combo can be mistaken for one from a much more expensive setup. The little super-wide certainly is a gem ... And I promise I'll keep quiet about the foibles of the camera; in the grand scheme of things, they're really not that important. I'm just embarrassingly good at noticing them and pointing them out - déformation professionelle, I fear ...
The other thing annoys the heck out of me; here's the thing: With some cameras, notably the M10 and the E-M5 III, Polarr (my current "quick" editor I use most of the time when posting online) "eats" EXIF and spits out - this. I don't know why, and it seems arbitrary (for instance, the M8's and M 262's images get to keep their EXIF intact). There's no option to edit EXIF in Polarr as far as I'm aware - it's just a nuisance. That said, I've noticed that increasingly with other pieces of software that are equally "self-centered", I'm sure Pixlr did this to someone else's files just recently - sign of the times, perhaps (though hopefully passing now)? Just a random thought ...
M.