Bruce Gillham
Rookie
YOU ARE EXACTLY RIGHT!!!!! You can stop wondering, its true.nice shots antonio. you know, when i see colors and detail like that i wonder if we just change for change sake.
YOU ARE EXACTLY RIGHT!!!!! You can stop wondering, its true.nice shots antonio. you know, when i see colors and detail like that i wonder if we just change for change sake.
i just bought the 50/2 macro, should get it soon. what do you think of it? i'm also thinking of either the 40-150 or the 50-200 (non SWD)-any thoughts?
its pretty cheap too, though one can pick up the 40-150 for under $100usd!
.
ah, I was just about to ask if anyone knew the weight of the older non-swd without the tripod collar.
The only official weight info I can find (even on Olympus' website) is the weight for the older one including collar (1.07kg) and the weight for the new one without collar (995 g).
Would love to know the weight of the older one without the collar
gorgeous. what do you think of your new 40-150? i got mine yesterday, only took some test photos, but it performs much better than the $35 i paid for it!