Many thanks to everyone who participated! I liked all the resulting images, and there was actually more variation than I had expected/feared from my simple offering.
The flaws which bothered me most about my image were:
3. Busy boring background with too little color/luminance contrast at the edges of the subject.
2. Shutter speed was too slow to freeze the wings. But the shallow depth of field would have left them blurry anyway.
1. And,
most annoyingly, no catch light in the eye.
Several folks tackled #3 (the background), thanks.
@Zeus1 tried to deal with #2 (motion blur) gave up, so that's probably a nearly impossible fix (at least for now). A few folks dealt obliquely with the lack of catch light in the eye, but only one edit seemed really effective.
I thought color images were more effective than B&W for this image. My favorite B&Ws were by
@kae1 and
@mike3996 , but they were all good.
In the color images, I preferred the ones which were processed a bit warmer compared too the cooler ones. I also preferred Goldilocks saturation (not too hot, not too cold).
As to the catch light,
@Hendrik ,
@mike3996 ,
@Rob R , and
@RichardC (#2) all recovered a hint of the latent sky reflection, but only
@kae1 really nailed it. And without that detail, the eye just seems dead.
And so. . .
Winner: The rest of
@kae1 's processing on his color entry was pleasing, too, so he is our winner. Congratulations, Ken!
Runner-up: This surprised me, but I quite enjoyed
@RichardC 's 2nd entry with the
woven brick texture and the peachy background hue. Nicely done, Richard!