- Location
- Seattle
- Name
- Andrew
Curious as well, I haven't defragged an SSD, whenever I look up the drive in Windows it shows as 0% fragmented. I understand SSDs to write data differently than a HDD.
There is no point in defragging an SSD. No heads or spinning platters. You are only using up your writes.I am a bit reluctant to defrag an SSD as they have a limited amount of writes.
There isn’t a need with SSD drives. Only conventional spinning drives and really only depending if your particular usage leads to likely fragmentation. Like anything it can be overdone.@Grinsaround and @Herbert Hound do you use the Defraggler program on SSD's also?
I am a bit reluctant to defrag an SSD as they have a limited amount of writes.
I agree, but it depends what you use your computer for. Different strokes for different folks. Some people torrent, steam alot etc. Nevermind po...o's But what you say is true. Keep 2 machines one for banking, personal emails etc. And one for "fun" Or install a rack system like I did. Just swap out the drive and you have a different computer. 1 Linux, 1 Server, etc....You know, I've used many of the programs mentioned so far, but I'm having trouble thinking of anything I consider essential nowadays. I rebuilt my desktop a little while back and I don't know that I've installed much of anything beyond image editing programs since. I find Windows 10 natively offers many of the things that serve my needs fairly well: Edge is clean and fast, Windows Photo Viewer is simple (and I use image editing programs to get more in-depth with my images), Windows security tools are usually enough to keep a computer clean and running well... I don't want to sound like a Windows fanboy, but I will say I think things are in a much more user-friendly place than they have been in a long time. Maybe Firefox and FastStone will get installed sometime, maybe not.
I definitely get that. I've played with my PC a lot more in the past, right now I need both the desktop and the laptop to function dependably with no hoops to jump through. At some point in the future, I'm sure I will customize the heck out of the desktop once more!I agree, but it depends what you use your computer for. Different strokes for different folks. Some people torrent, steam alot etc. Nevermind po...o's But what you say is true. Keep 2 machines one for banking, personal emails etc. And one for "fun" Or install a rack system like I did. Just swap out the drive and you have a different computer. 1 Linux, 1 Server, etc....
There's two parts to the Defraggler program. There's an "Optimiser" and a "Defragment". I used the optimiser (there's a quick optimiser option too) but when I tried the defragger it gave me a warning that this could cause problems down the line... so I didn't use it. The optimiser has made a difference... but I'm not sure what it's actually done.@Grinsaround and @Herbert Hound do you use the Defraggler program on SSD's also?
I am a bit reluctant to defrag an SSD as they have a limited amount of writes.
Back in the day, optimizers usually deleted old registry files which were left behind by sloppy uninstallers and the like. I don't know whether that's how it still works.There's two parts to the Defraggler program. There's an "Optimiser" and a "Defragment". I used the optimiser (there's a quick optimiser option too) but when I tried the defragger it gave me a warning that this could cause problems down the line... so I didn't use it. The optimiser has made a difference... but I'm not sure what it's actually done.
This page from Piriform explains what the optimiser function does... Clickety-click.Back in the day, optimizers usually deleted old registry files which were left behind by sloppy uninstallers and the like. I don't know whether that's how it still works.
I defrag my SSDs about once a year. Full, boot time defrag. However, the longevity of Kingston HyperfuryX and Samsung EVO SSDs are unlikely to be a problem, with destruction testing (format/write to full/reformat cycles until dead) of over 2 Petabytes before failure. Some SSDs fail routinely at less than 500 TB of this testing.@Grinsaround and @Herbert Hound do you use the Defraggler program on SSD's also?
I am a bit reluctant to defrag an SSD as they have a limited amount of writes.
SYNCBACK is your friend ...Perhaps out of ignorance, I tend not to use backup programs whereby the backup needs to be "restored". I use (free) MS Synctoy because the backups it creates are straight copies of the files, so I can always simply copy the files back as needed.
Just out of curiosity, what is the benefit of defragging an SSD?I defrag my SSDs about once a year. Full, boot time defrag. However, the longevity of Kingston HyperfuryX and Samsung EVO SSDs are unlikely to be a problem, with destruction testing (format/write to full/reformat cycles until dead) of over 2 Petabytes before failure. Some SSDs fail routinely at less than 500 TB of this testing.
Both these drives use the TRIM function, and Seagate's patented write optimisation chip. IIRC, they are both hybrid drives, using system type RAM for caching prior to writing to the SSD proper.
Andrew, like anything retrieved, there are always other system overheads involved with FETCH cycles to read and clock cycles to concatenate the data after reading and before use.Just out of curiosity, what is the benefit of defragging an SSD?