b20150126-2 by _loupe, on Flickr
b20150127-1 by _loupe, on Flickr
b20150127-1-2 by _loupe, on Flickr
wish I could understand these and why 19 people like them
I don't dislike them but I would like to know what the intention was and why people like them
Now we have "Like" rather than "Thanks" presumably there is an intention for critique
Paul, what is the message, ("pour"), or whatever that you are trying to convey with these images as it would be interesting to have an open discussion on them
Maybe I can see a relationship to "pour" in #1 and #2 but why did you choose that description
wish I could understand these and why 19 people like them
I don't dislike them but I would like to know what the intention was and why people like them
Now we have "Like" rather than "Thanks" presumably there is an intention for critique
Paul, what is the message, ("pour"), or whatever that you are trying to convey with these images as it would be interesting to have an open discussion on them
Maybe I can see a relationship to "pour" in #1 and #2 but why did you choose that description
Paul said:the impact of a photograph on the viewer can be quite independent of the aims of the photographer. We can plan the content and composition all we like, but viewers’ responses will always contain an element of unpredictability.
I rarely discuss or explain my photos (much to the annoyance of some folk on forums), because once a photograph is made, and is out there, that’s it for me – it’s over to the viewer and is there to be responded to in whatever way
+1I often feel that a photograph (or any work of art really) is like Schrodinger's cat. One can't pick it apart and try and understand it without losing something in the process.