iPad Pro 12.9": Some pix are still squeezed, but not all, and I am now getting a full page of them instead of the minimal view I was getting before. Its an improvement.
The images are dynamically resized to fit the device screen dimensions so there'll always be some that might appear a little squeezed.
The alternatives to a using a fully responsive design is to either leave gaps of wide space around each image, to crop the preview images to be squared so that they can be displayed in a grid instead of keeping the original image orientation & proportions, or to use a hard set content width & height targeting specific devices.
The problem with leaving gaps is that, well, it's just ugly and there's no reason for it.
The problem with auto cropping images is what gets cropped might be what is of interest unless somebody manually crops each individual image for the preview and makes the decision on how the preview image should be edited.
The problem with using a hard set content area is that depending on your device, browser, and screen size you may or may not end seeing the images zoomed in/out or you may end up with the images being shown full size with scroll bars.
A response design that dynamically scales is the most friendly solution for trying to accomodate all devices (
laptops, phones, tablets), all OSs (
Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, Linux), all browsers (
Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Opera, Safari and their various offshoots), source images that could be of nearly any dimensions (
when uploading images we don't enforce a max or min value for height & width), and all while making it as easy as possible for the community team members to 'feature' an image.
Now that the Safari issue seems to be under control, give it a chance.