Menu
Home
Photography Forums
Buy, Sell & Trade
Featured Photos
Media Gallery
Resources
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Buy & Sell
Buy, Sell & Trade
Cameraderie Affiliate Vendors!
Support Cameraderie
Affiliate Vendors
Become a subscriber!
Log in
Register
Back
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Cameraderie
, a friendly photography forum,
join now for free!
Home
Forums
Photography Gear
Film Photography
Fudging the film, development or scanning?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Streetshooter" data-source="post: 79620" data-attributes="member: 71"><p>Mark, Have you calibrated your system? I mean, shutter, film and for proper ISO, light meter, developer...dilution, temp, time, agitation, fixer, same as dev...etc</p><p>Same for prints....</p><p>If you need help, I'll be glad to offer my experience. I think I would dump that developer and get something with some guts to it. FG7 or Rodinal are great and you can add things to either to get different results.</p><p>If your planning on really doing silver, you really should calibrate. It's a 35mm version of the Zone System. The variables need to be under control at all times.</p><p></p><p>Your 1st image looks to me to be almost flatlined. It has a decent tonal range but no life. Adding contrast like you did in version 2 will generally start to blow the high values out. See the left side of the fur region. </p><p>If you plan on scanning and then going into Silver Efex, it's best to go into it with a straight line. Then your adjustments are more controlled in Nik.</p><p></p><p>If your going to silver prints, you have to get the ACCUTANCE up with more snap and a more "S" shape curve. This would happen in the neg soup not the print soup. </p><p>We can chat if you like, my darkroom is still running. I have many chemicals I can send if you can't get them in OZ. </p><p>I still have about 10lbs of real Amidol.</p><p>Let me know....don</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Streetshooter, post: 79620, member: 71"] Mark, Have you calibrated your system? I mean, shutter, film and for proper ISO, light meter, developer...dilution, temp, time, agitation, fixer, same as dev...etc Same for prints.... If you need help, I'll be glad to offer my experience. I think I would dump that developer and get something with some guts to it. FG7 or Rodinal are great and you can add things to either to get different results. If your planning on really doing silver, you really should calibrate. It's a 35mm version of the Zone System. The variables need to be under control at all times. Your 1st image looks to me to be almost flatlined. It has a decent tonal range but no life. Adding contrast like you did in version 2 will generally start to blow the high values out. See the left side of the fur region. If you plan on scanning and then going into Silver Efex, it's best to go into it with a straight line. Then your adjustments are more controlled in Nik. If your going to silver prints, you have to get the ACCUTANCE up with more snap and a more "S" shape curve. This would happen in the neg soup not the print soup. We can chat if you like, my darkroom is still running. I have many chemicals I can send if you can't get them in OZ. I still have about 10lbs of real Amidol. Let me know....don [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Photography Gear
Film Photography
Fudging the film, development or scanning?
This site uses cookies to help personalize content and to keep you logged in when you join. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom