Herman
The Image Stimulator
- Location
- The Netherlands
- Name
- Herman
When will Fuji announce the X-H2?
IBIS is the feature that got my attention with the X-H1. After using Olympus for so long, I don't think I could get by without that crutch with my shaky hands. The X-H1 is a heck of a camera, so I'm interested in seeing what the next generation looks like.I like IBIS of the X-Hx cameras
It's a great camera if you are going out to shoot. It's a bit big if you are doing something else and just want a camera with you.i like the X-H1 a lot, though not its size and weigt?
For me the key feature will be the "selfie LCD". If the X-H2 retains the current model's 2-way tilt screen then I'll be really tempted to go all in on Fuji. If they switch to a fully articulated screen (which I fear is a strong possibility), then I'll be more likely to stick with M43 and "settle" for moving upgrading to an E-M1.3 or OM-1....
Personally, I like the X-H1. I hope the 2 has the improvements I need in the AF department, larger buffer, faster buffer clearing, improved EVF. I also hope they don't remove more control points, add a selfie LCD, and make the camera smaller.
Really looking forward to further info.
For me the key feature will be the "selfie LCD". If the X-H2 retains the current model's 2-way tilt screen then I'll be really tempted to go all in on Fuji. If they switch to a fully articulated screen (which I fear is a strong possibility), then I'll be more likely to stick with M43 and "settle" for moving upgrading to an E-M1.3 or OM-1.
- K
The industry trend is definitely in favor of selfie screens, so I don't have a lot of hope either. I'd put the odds of a tilt screen at maybe 5:1 against. The rumors of there being two X-H2's give me a little hope — maybe they could give the video-focused version the selfie screen (for the vloggers) and maintain the tilt screen on the stills version. That's probably just misplaced optimism, though.Honestly, I'm not optimistic. Fuji has been on a design trend in a direction away from what I need and prefer. Looking at costs to change systems (again), I might have to stop shooting mil aviation stuff. Not sure what I'm going to do gear-wise if Fuji makes the 2 less useable for my needs.
The industry trend is definitely in favor of selfie screens, so I don't have a lot of hope either. I'd put the odds of a tilt screen at maybe 5:1 against. The rumors of there being two X-H2's give me a little hope — maybe they could give the video-focused version the selfie screen (for the vloggers) and maintain the tilt screen on the stills version. That's probably just misplaced optimism, though.
If the selfie screen comes to pass on the new camera, it would be good for my pocketbook. It's exceedingly rare that my current gear is the reason my images aren't better, anyway.
- K
The rumor mill says that the announcement will come in May 2022 at the Fuji X Summit.When will Fuji announce the X-H2?
It's aim is to be a gripped body, so it's not about size, but proper layout and comfort, especially with larger lenses. The question really is, does this style work better for your lens lineup? I prefer the X-T body style as a nice compromise, and I don't want big lenses. I got the 10-24 WR and now I'm wondering if maybe a prime at the UWA end would have been the better choice. Hard to argue with 10mm though. Usually UWAs can't be wide enough for me.The eternal battle of the screen. Camera makers just can't win this one. I assume making to different options is too expensive or it would have been done. OTOH, maybe we are just kidding ourselves and the vast majority of buyers don't care. I wonder what groups will buy the XH2, either model. It is big for an APS-C camera. Their other recent camera, the X-S10 was clearly aimed at those that preferred the more modern interface but still like Fuji. As I've said before, I find the X-S10 ergonomics a lot like the Oly E-M1, which is one reason I like it so much. Dedicated dials vs. assignable dials are not a real issue for me.
I had the X-H1 with the grip and it was wonderful to use. I can easily see it as a preferred camera for a day of photography. It's just heavy to tote around Disneyworld, which, alas, is typical of my current uses. I really think Fuji is trying to find the range and limits of its lineup and even though most agree they have to trim their line a bit, no one agrees which bodies show be trimmed. I like the idea of one of the XE, XS, XT and maybe two XH, the latter being one video and one high res. Of course, that may still be too many.It's aim is to be a gripped body, so it's not about size, but proper layout and comfort, especially with larger lenses. The question really is, does this style work better for your lens lineup? I prefer the X-T body style as a nice compromise, and I don't want big lenses. I got the 10-24 WR and now I'm wondering if maybe a prime at the UWA end would have been the better choice. Hard to argue with 10mm though. Usually UWAs can't be wide enough for me.![]()