Out to Lunch
Top Veteran
I am happy shops like this can remain in business.Indeed this store easily induces massive amounts of GAS.
I am happy shops like this can remain in business.Indeed this store easily induces massive amounts of GAS.
I buy stuff by browsing the net. Can you imagine if I could actually hold the bloody thing? Credit cards are not that hard to take out of a pocket.Looks like a dangerous store ($)
I agree, not a whole lot of improvement over the V other than the sensor. The upcoming Pro4 with interchangeable lenses may be worth the wait for Fuji users.I've decided to cancel my pre order. FWIW here is my reasoning after spending a week with the X-T5 and various lenses.
My conclusion is for the of sort images you would shoot with the X100V the 40mp sensor makes no difference, especially if you are using a film sim or filter.
I took a bunch of shots of a fence. It wasn't much fun but the results were interesting.
1. The lens absolutely matters. The 35F2 on the X-T5 delivered somewhat more detailed fence pictures than the 23F2 of the 100V (at f5.6). The Tamron 17-70 shot at approx 23 on the X-T5 was definitely inferior at f5.6.
2. IBIS for me in daylight is pretty much irrelevant. I can easily handhold to somewhat below 1/FL and on a 35mm equivalent lens that is plenty.
Couple this result with the DPR test shots that show the X100V to be somewhat less sharp than the X-T3/4 on the same 26mp sensor. And, the minor increase in detail with the 40mp sensor over the 26mp, results in the 40mp sensor being less of an upgrade in the X100. I personally feel the X100VI test shot results will be inferior to the X-T5. Also the 40mp sensor is a 1/2 stop behind in DR.
The AF and the speed of operation will certainly be faster with the VI, does this matter for a camera like the X100? Not for me.
IBIS for my use, which involves a lot of vibration, is probably a deal breaker or at least a camera breaker. So no VI for me.
If IBIS failure was not top of mind I might make the switch. IBIS would be nice in low light and I am sure the 40mp would offer some benefits at times. The speed of operation is certainly nice with the XtransV and the new sims would be fun. Enough for the delta between the V and the VI? I dunno.
Have a look at Fuji weekly to go down the rabbit hole of film sims.Ours arrived yesterday, silver for the wife and black for me. Here's a pic taken this morning after our latest dump of snow (still ongoing!!) I've shot mainly Olympus for the last 10 years so I can see a learning curve ahead of us.
View attachment 452036
Remember years ago those b&w files of the Ricoh GRII that couldn’t be replicated in PP? It would be good to get your view on whether the new Fuji can do something similar👍.Well I'm happy...
View attachment 455232View attachment 455233View attachment 455234View attachment 455235View attachment 455236View attachment 455237View attachment 455238View attachment 455239
These shots are all taken with the Reala Ace setting and are SOOC save for some diligent cropping on the "street portraits".
I'll explore. My "other pocket" is occupied by my GRIIIx 😉Remember years ago those b&w files of the Ricoh GRII that couldn’t be replicated in PP? It would be good to get your view on whether the new Fuji can do something similar👍.
I ordered mine, unofficially, a few days before the announcement, placed a deposit on the day, and picked it up a week ago. That gave me time to sell a couple of cameras and a kidney on eBay so I could afford it.