IMG_0111.jpeg


IMG_0112.jpeg



:unsure:

it seems to me we’re very far from what m43 used to be.

Or at least Panasonic is targeting a very specific user-group with this cam. I sort of get it with the 100-400 lens.

I checked Panasonics global website to check their marketing. To check what the plan is. No mention of the G9ii it seems Panasonic Holdings Corporation

The US site Panasonic North America | Create Today, Enrich Tomorrow Nothing either? I even used the search function.

The Dutch/Belgium site has at least the S5ii on the frontpage; Panasonic België | Informatie over al onze producten

Too early? Not for sale yet? Or, … no marketing plan?

as a contrast: iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max or check the new Polaroid: Discover the Polaroid I-2 Instant Camera

edit: or am I to snarky? Missing something?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 412135

View attachment 412137


:unsure:

it seems to me we’re very far from what m43 used to be.

Or at least Panasonic is targeting a very specific user-group with this cam. I sort of get it with the 100-400 lens.

I checked Panasonics global website to check their marketing. To check what the plan is. No mention of the G9ii it seems Panasonic Holdings Corporation

The US site Panasonic North America | Create Today, Enrich Tomorrow Nothing either? I even used the search function.

The Dutch/Belgium site has at least the S5ii on the frontpage; Panasonic België | Informatie over al onze producten

Too early? Not for sale yet? Or, … no marketing plan?

as a contrast: iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max or check the new Polaroid: Discover the Polaroid I-2 Instant Camera

edit: or am I to snarky? Missing something?
Even with the 100-400, which I think they actually managed to shrink for v2, you don’t need this big of a body. I shot the 100-400 with the E-M1.3 before, and it actually was a little better because it seemingly took just enough weight away to notice.
 
I like this new Panasonic G9II and don't think it is THAT significantly bigger than other machines out there.

However the use of the S5 body make sense because the camera markets are not like they were several years ago so reusing the S5 body means they can get some improved AF and burst rate tech in there without having to create a new assembly line and make a new body plus is must also improve there over heads as well making the cost of the new camera to us, the consumer, a more attractive price point.
 
I like this new Panasonic G9II and don't think it is THAT significantly bigger than other machines out there.

However the use of the S5 body make sense because the camera markets are not like they were several years ago so reusing the S5 body means they can get some improved AF and burst rate tech in there without having to create a new assembly line and make a new body plus is must also improve there over heads as well making the cost of the new camera to us, the consumer, a more attractive price point.
I'm guessing it's going to use the same engine as the S5 II as well. If it was mentioned, I didn't see it in the reviews. It's certainly not a bad plan to reuse as much as they can across the line, there's clearly enough differentiation between the FF and M43 line in terms of cost and lens selection. As much as I wish the G9II was something smaller, it's still good to see Panasonic putting something new into the M43 line. This isn't even just a "throw the GH6 guts into the old G9 body" situation.

I hope it does really well. The GH6 does not appear to be well received, as it was getting some big price cuts not long after launch. Curious if they'll get a Mark II out soon, if only to apply the same low ISO DR fix to the sensor.
 
Ran into this oveview here Numbers Mean Everything/Nothing | Cameras and Photography Explained | Thom Hogan

IMG_5410.jpeg


OM System is supposedly around 3.5%

Maybe this is just as good as it gets. And the only way to get the business case working was indeed to ruthlessly reuse existing parts. Possibly the GH-series could even be phased out. If I understood correctly, the G9II surpasses the GH6 in video capabilities. I just hope there is a case to be made still for a smaller mu43 Panasonic. Like a G100 II.

Just to make a point:

IMG_0114.jpeg
 
I wonder how much of this trend towards larger rather than smaller mirrorless cameras is due to faster data movement and processing = more heat generated, and the need for bigger passive heatsink and/or airflow in the design? It's not a negligible consideration. A tiny, modern camera like the GRIII series has gotten some knocks for heating up during operation, but I think as we get faster processors and larger/higher-MP sensors, we run into physics...
 
The G9II forgoes the active fan found Im that you’ll find in both the GH6 and the S5. High resolution video really is the issue here, as it’s having to encode on the fly. I suspect the G9II has a video time limit so it doesn’t completely eat the GH6’s lunch. I think for straight up stills, this is overkill, unless you want to use that crazy high burst rate. Designs seem to be scaling up to these types of use cases.
 
The G9II forgoes the active fan found Im that you’ll find in both the GH6 and the S5. High resolution video really is the issue here, as it’s having to encode on the fly. I suspect the G9II has a video time limit so it doesn’t completely eat the GH6’s lunch. I think for straight up stills, this is overkill, unless you want to use that crazy high burst rate. Designs seem to be scaling up to these types of use cases.
The G9 II has unlimited recording, but it also has thermal cut off thresholds for when the camera heats up too much. A few preliminary tests show that the G9 II seems to record fine on a 21 degree day, but cuts off after about a hour on a 25 degree day, see Micro Four Nerds on YouTube. Apparently it has a large heat sink and is less prone to overheating due to the larger body size.
 
Back
Top