GAS GAS: Please Share your Latest Acquisitions Big and Small

Sadly, it turns out that a 31.5" (says 32" on the box) monitor is simply way too big. It felt like sitting right in front of the TV!

I need to do some more research what to get. My previous monitor was (okay, is) a 24" slightly curved Samsung model with 120 htz refresh rate, but only 1080p. I'd like at least 1440p, and probably around 27". If I can find 100% sRGB, higher than 60 refresh rate, and (maybe) HDR for a good price, I'll probably go for it.
Andrew, 24.x to 25.x" appears to be the sweet spot, for me. Doesn't involve too much neck twisting, which my neck and back don't like.

Our two Asus Pro PA246Q and one Dell UP2516D are all about ~100% aRGB, but the Dell has a better colour LUT and deeper bit depth panel. Just noticeably better than the Asus monitors.

All were moderately expensive, but not kidney type prices.
 
Andrew, 24.x to 25.x" appears to be the sweet spot, for me. Doesn't involve too much neck twisting, which my neck and back don't like.

Our two Asus Pro PA246Q and one Dell UP2516D are all about ~100% aRGB, but the Dell has a better colour LUT and deeper bit depth panel. Just noticeably better than the Asus monitors.

All were moderately expensive, but not kidney type prices.
Thanks John, I'm thinking 25" as well. There's another BenQ model with 1440p resolution and HDR, 100% sRGB, for a little more than the one I tried out. I might end up going for that one. 60 Htz, but I may give up on faster frame rate, as that's rare for the higher resolution and color-accurate displays, it seems.
 
I guess I'm the only crazy one with a 42 inch OLED TV as my main editing monitor, but I am sitting at 80 cm away so I don't have to twist my neck around, eye-rolling is enough to get from one edge to another ... BUT I do have to move my head between my gaming monitor on my left side and the TV on my right side when I am multitasking.
Thanks John, I'm thinking 25" as well. There's another BenQ model with 1440p resolution and HDR, 100% sRGB, for a little more than the one I tried out. I might end up going for that one. 60 Htz, but I may give up on faster frame rate, as that's rare for the higher resolution and color-accurate displays, it seems.
You can get 24 to 27-inch 1440p over 100% sRGB (and colour accurate) monitor at 120, 144, 165, 240 Hz ... just look for the gaming monitors, especially the new OLED and\or the Mini LED gaming monitors. They won't be cheap (or as cheap as content creation-oriented models) but it is doable.
 
Thanks John, I'm thinking 25" as well. There's another BenQ model with 1440p resolution and HDR, 100% sRGB, for a little more than the one I tried out. I might end up going for that one. 60 Htz, but I may give up on faster frame rate, as that's rare for the higher resolution and color-accurate displays, it seems.
Screenshot 2025-01-17 at 21.15.42.png

It has a true 10-bit panel, incredible contrast and blacks from being OLED, 360 Hz (overkill for anyone but true professional eSports players), 1440p, G-Sync and FreeSync, even a Tripod Socket to hold a camera for streaming/video calling. The only downsides are the high price of 700 $ and the HDR is basically pointless at only 400.

Something a bit less esoteric:
Screenshot 2025-01-17 at 21.17.11.png

More affordable price at half the cost, 4K resolution at 27 inches, 160 HZ, 135% sRGB colour accuracy. The downsides are useless HDR at 400, IPS means less contrast and grey-er blacks, 4K can be very difficult to run on older machines or older graphics cards.
 
Just recently "upgraded" from my 2010 Mac Pro...to the 2013 Mac Pro. 😃 They are so cheap now, this one was a dual D700 with 64GB of RAM for $215 on the E of Bays. It lacked a blade drive, but no worries, I already had one. I also installed a spare Xeon 2697v2 12C/24T CPU I had available. I believe such a configuration would have cost about $6000 back when this model was new. It's kinda like picking up a classic car, I suppose. Even with the fastest GPU available, the graphics power is not all that, but it's more than adequate for CaptureOne Pro 2023. With a Fuji sensor, I don't lean on AI NR or sharpening, so believe it or not, this old Mac is plenty powerful for my needs. I know it was a controversial design, but when you pop the cylinder cover off, it really is an engineering marvel. You really start to appreciate it when you perform a CPU swap, which takes a solid 20 minutes, but it's a joy to peel back the layers of this old machine and see how well built it was.

Not only that, but by using OpenCore Legacy Patcher, I'm theoretically able to run the latest version of macOS on it, though right now I'm happily running Ventura with no troubles. Someday I hope to own the 2019 Mac Pro too, but I'm probably going to have to wait another 5-6 years before they come down to my pricepoint. I've yet to drop more than $300 on a Mac Pro to date, and they are still worthy machines if you don't need lots of power.
 
Last edited:
A good but somewhat expensive week. First, there was a Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH (11663 version) listed on FredMiranda by a very reputable seller for a very good price. He stated that it was sharper than his previous Summilux. This lens has been on my radar for over 3 years now but I did not want to pay the price so to speak. At the price I paid, I can't go wrong. It came only with the caps, no box, hood or pouch which is fine for me. The cost to buy a used 2022 close focus 35 Summilux would have been thousands more than what I paid, not worth it for me. The lens is indeed sharp and in perfect condition, I am very happy with it. In the picture below you can see the very thin EIN filter on the Summilux that I mentioned in an earlier post.

The second lens is the Leica Leitz Wetzlar Tele-Elmar 135mm F4 M Mount. After getting the SL2-S, I figured a longer lens would be good addition because of IBIS and an EVF. I went back and forth between the options, including R mount lenses which can be found for a good price. I did not want to pay a lot which ruled out the APO. I looked at a few used 135 APO's on my recent trip to Shanghai and while I liked the size, I did not like the price for a lens/FOV that I doubt I will use a lot. In reading numerous reviews, many recommended the Tele-Elmar. I found one on ebay where the seller had owned AND used it for over 4 decades! I figured it must be a decent copy and the pictures in the listing bore that out. He was open to offers so I made what I felt was a fair offer and he accepted. It arrived today and all I can say is it has exceeded my expectations. It is in near mint condition and so far seems to be very sharp. The glass is immaculate and focus is buttery smooth! It is big and heavy for the Leica M world but small in the FF 135mm world. Mounted on the SL2-S, focus is fast and easy to get sharp results.

Both lenses were purchased at good prices so I can use and enjoy them but when the time comes to sell (most likely by my kids), they will be worth as much as I paid if not more.
IMG_4155.jpeg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
A good but somewhat expensive week. First, there was a Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH (11663 version) listed on FredMiranda by a very reputable seller for a very good price. He stated that it was sharper than his previous Summilux. This lens has been on my radar for over 3 years now but I did not want to pay the price so to speak. At the price I paid, I can't go wrong. It came only with the caps, no box, hood or pouch which is fine for me. The cost to buy a used 2022 close focus 35 Summilux would have been thousands more than what I paid, not worth it for me. The lens is indeed sharp and in perfect condition, I am very happy with it. In the picture below you can see the very thin EIN filter on the Summilux that I mentioned in an earlier post.

The second lens is the Leica Leitz Wetzlar Tele-Elmar 135mm F4 M Mount. After getting the SL2-S, I figured a longer lens would be good addition because of IBIS and an EVF. I went back and forth between the options, including R mount lenses which can be found for a good price. I did not want to pay a lot which ruled out the APO. I looked at a few used 135 APO's on my recent trip to Shanghai and while I liked the size, I did not like the price for a lens/FOV that I doubt I will use a lot. In reading numerous reviews, many recommended the Tele-Elmar. I found one on ebay where the seller had owned AND used it for over 4 decades! I figured it must be a decent copy and the pictures in the listing bore that out. He was open to offers so I made what I felt was a fair offer and he accepted. It arrived today and all I can say is it has exceeded my expectations. It is in near mint condition and so far seems to be very sharp. The glass is immaculate and focus is buttery smooth! It is big and heavy for the Leica M world but small in the FF 135mm world. Mounted on the SL2-S, focus is fast and easy to get sharp results.

Both lenses were purchased at good prices so I can use and enjoy them but when the time comes to sell (most likely by my kids), they will be worth as much as I paid if not more.
View attachment 524771
Congrats. Looks right at home on your M11.
 
So this one is a *re-*acquisition for me: an Exc+ Fuji X-Pro1.

I've owned X-Pro1 cameras since they first came out in 2012 - the first one ordered immediately upon release. I've had at least one (and for a while two) almost ever since. Recently I went looking for my sole remaining one in my gear locker, but after not finding it, remembered that I had passed it to a friend a couple years back. In a fit of nostalgia, a few weeks ago I took a look at the current market for these. Wow, used ones are now selling for about double what they were just some 2-3 years ago! So I gave up on that pretty quickly.

Then, I stumbled on one that was priced rather low. The seller noted that he'd acquired it in a trade just a short time ago, didn't gel with it, but it had a scratched LCD so he was letting it go for a low price. However, looking at the photos I realized something that someone not familiar with the model might not: the LCD on the X-Pro1 has a pretty deep frame around it, with the LCD itself rather inset compared to a lot of cameras. That is, the LCD had a screen protector on it, but the protector was flush with the frame - it didn't protrude, and was very evenly positioned - so it would appear to not have one. The screen protector definitely had a mild (not bad, really) scratch. But was the actual LCD underneath also scratched? Was the seller referring to another underlying scratch and not the one immediately visible? Since it was priced low, I decided to gamble that it did not, pretty sure I could resell without loss if it didn't meet my expectation. The camera is otherwise "exc+" with a few marks here and there but overall very clean.

So I bought it and it arrived last weekend. Sure enough, prying up the screen protector with a bit of dental floss showed a pristine actual LCD underneath! And the camera works perfectly. The light scratch on the protector really doesn't bother me, so I just pressed it back on. All in all, I ended up with a pretty nice deal on a lovely X-Pro1. I've always enjoyed the somewhat unique look and color science of the X-Trans1 sensor, and it's been fun to carry as an EDC the past several days. I'm glad to have one back in the bag.

20250119-_DSF2165.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
Last edited:
So this one is a *re-*acquisition for me: an Exc+ Fuji X-Pro1.

I've owned X-Pro1 cameras since they first came out in 2012 - the first one ordered immediately upon release. I've had at least one (and for a while two) almost ever since. Recently I went looking for my sole remaining one in my gear locker, but after not finding it, remembered that I had passed it to a friend a couple years back. In a fit of nostalgia, a few weeks ago I took a look at the current market for these. Wow, used ones are now selling for about double what they were just some 2-3 years ago! So I gave up on that pretty quickly.

Then, I stumbled on one that was priced rather low. The seller noted that he'd acquired it in a trade just a short time ago, didn't gel with it, but it had a scratched LCD so he was letting it go for a low price. However, looking at the photos I realized something that someone not familiar with the model might not: the LCD on the X-Pro1 has a pretty deep frame around it, with the LCD itself rather inset compared to a lot of cameras. That is, the LCD had a screen protector on it, but the protector was flush with the frame - it didn't protrude, and was very evenly positioned - so it would appear to not have one. The screen protector definitely had a mild (not bad, really) scratch. But was the actual LCD underneath also scratched? Was the seller referring to another underlying scratch and not the one immediately visible? Since it was priced low, I decided to gamble that it did not, pretty sure I could resell without loss if it didn't meet my expectation. The camera is otherwise "exc+" with a few marks here and there but overall very clean.

So I bought it and it arrived last weekend. Sure enough, prying up the screen protector with a bit of dental floss showed a pristine actual LCD underneath! And the camera works perfectly. The light scratch on the protector really doesn't bother me, so I just pressed it back on. All in all, I ended up with a pretty nice deal on a lovely X-Pro1. I've always enjoyed the somewhat unique look and color science of the X-Trans1 sensor, and it's been fun to carry as an EDC the past several days. I'm glad to have one back in the bag.

View attachment 525033
Good for you! The x-pro is an itch I would still like to scratch, but Fuji mania needs to settle down a bit before I look at anything seriously.
 
Just recently "upgraded" from my 2010 Mac Pro...to the 2013 Mac Pro. 😃 They are so cheap now, this one was a dual D700 with 64GB of RAM for $215 on the E of Bays. It lacked a blade drive, but no worries, I already had one. I also installed a spare Xeon 2697v2 12C/24T CPU I had available. I believe such a configuration would have cost about $6000 back when this model was new. It's kinda like picking up a classic car, I suppose. Even with the fastest GPU available, the graphics power is not all that, but it's more than adequate for CaptureOne Pro 2023. With a Fuji sensor, I don't lean on AI NR or sharpening, so believe it or not, this old Mac is plenty powerful for my needs. I know it was a controversial design, but when you pop the cylinder cover off, it really is an engineering marvel. You really start to appreciate it when you perform a CPU swap, which takes a solid 20 minutes, but it's a joy to peel back the layers of this old machine and see how well built it was.

Not only that, but by using OpenCore Legacy Patcher, I'm theoretically able to run the latest version of macOS on it, though right now I'm happily running Ventura with no troubles. Someday I hope to own the 2019 Mac Pro too, but I'm probably going to have to wait another 5-6 years before they come down to my pricepoint. I've yet to drop more than $300 on a Mac Pro to date, and they are still worthy machines if you don't need lots of power.

I've been tempted by these old 'trashcan' Mac Pro's for some time and am pleased to see that someone else is as well. If you have any recommendations about things to get or to avoid on them, please share them. And congrats on yours!
 
Hai. So I mentioned earlier of something coming, it arrived an hour ago and a lot sooner then I expected since it's coming from Netherlands and I bought it on Saturday.

PXL_20250120_110204724.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

I have been itching to try the Samsung NX system for MANY MANY years since it came out but I could never really get into it because of the price and lack of IBIS. So I ignored the system and waited until it dropped in price because the system was abandoned in 2014. In the last 2 years I have noticed at CEX (local UK electronics and gaming used store) that the Samsung NX lenses go for almost dirt cheap price for what they can offer in terms of IQ and performance, here's a the list of the lenses that I am interested (though mostly on the prime lenses):
*Samsung NX 12-24mm f 4-5.6 ED: 200 £
*Samsung NX 18-200mm f 3.5-5.6 ED OIS: 215 £
*Samsung NX 50-200mm f 4-5.6 ED OIS III: 85 £
*Samsung NX S 16-50mm f 2-2.8 ED: 500 £
*Samsung NX S 50-150mm f 2.8 ED OIS: 250 £
*Samsung NX 10mm f 3.5 Fisheye Pancake: 35 £
*Samsung NX 16mm f 2.4 Pancake: 65 £
*Samsung NX 20mm f 2.8 Pancake: 75 £
*Samsung NX 30mm f 2 Pancake: 120 £
*Samsung NX 45mm f 1.8: 150 £
*Samsung NX 60mm f 2.8 ED OIS SSA Macro: 200 £
*Samsung NX 85mm f 1.4 ED SSA: 235 £

One can have all the pancake lenses for just 300 £. Most of the zooms are extremely cheap, except for the pro-oriented 16-50mm f 2-2.8, and most of them are not even that big or heavy either. Some of them come in matching white colour with my Samsung NX500 too, the 50-200mm & 10mm & 16mm & 30mm & 45mm, and the 20mm comes in black or silver only.

NOW, the reason why the system popped into my head was that I was looking to get a pocket-friendly camera with a flippy screen for selfies because I want more pictures with me and my dog this year and I was close to getting the Panasonic GF9/850/880 and seeing the prices for it on evilBay and the Samsung NX was being advertised between the search results. I looked if there are any NX xxx series that does have a flippy screen and I found 3: Samsung NX 3000, NX 300M and NX500 ... after looking through evilBay for all the models I found a seller that was selling this NX 500 with 16-50mm f 3.5-5.6 Power Zoom and 20mm f 2.8 Pancake for 300 £ from Netherlands.

PXL_20250120_110153827.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Now it's not without a fault hence the attractive price BUT I was thinking: HEY I CAN FIX THAT ... it's just 2 missing screws from the hinge to the camera body, I can either find 2 size fitting screws or ask one of the phone shops that advertise repairs if they can fit 2 screws for me ... AND THAT WOULD BE ONE HELL OF A DEAL.

So I put my brain on a number crunching and the more I thought about it the more tempting it was getting. And what sealed the deal for me was that IF I can get that sexy 10mm f 3.5 Fisheye Pancake then I would have one hell of a setup for my doggie book. Of course then it means I will have 3 fisheye lenses within 3 systems with 3 different outputs BUT I think I can figure out which one to keep after I use them and compare them.

PXL_20250120_110217705.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

The camera works fine and I spent about 20 minutes cleaning it. I think the camera belongs to a non-photographic-oriented person because the poor NX 500 was dropped a few times and there are some dents in it, most likely on hard pavement because it took off the paint of the top aluminium plate as well as damaged the leathered cover. But it seems to be just cosmetic damage so it's not the end of the world (I am a more damaged person than my Samsung NX 500 so we belong to each other 😛 )

PXL_20250120_110236237.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

All the buttons and dials work fine, both lenses focus well and the OIS in the power zoom lens works well. It has a bit of a dent on the front plastic frame but it's not affecting the lens. I doubt I am going to use the power zoom lens all that much once I have the prime lenses.

PXL_20250120_111237750.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

PXL_20250120_111719860.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

The only think that has been a bit more disappointing is the crack on the tripod socket from the bottom, I can see the plastic frame being pulled out of the housing so I don't think it's safe to put it on a tripod so it doesn't cause any further stress on the socket and the bottom housing. I think at some point the camera fell down with the tripod connected to it and it stressed the housing out of it's plastic clips.

PXL_20250120_111630709.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

I can't wait to see what the 28 MP BIS CMOS APSC sensor can do and what colours it will render (as Samsung has a history of technology partnering with Pentax). I absolutely delighted and surprised how small and light the camera was. it's less than 300 grams and that's less than the Pany GF cameras.

PXL_20250120_112207121.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

PXL_20250120_112218240.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

PXL_20250120_112229425.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Ok, it's not as small as my Pentax Q BUT damn it's so close for a sensor so much bigger. I think it's still pocketable (I don't wear skinny jeans).

PXL_20250120_112243386.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


PXL_20250120_112309796.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

The only really significant difference is the lens mount sticking out because the NX mount is the longest of all mirrorless cameras (Samsung, why?) and the lenses will stick out a bit more. But seriously, the 01 Prime is just a little bit shorter in the end compared to the pretty close Samsung NX 20mm f 2.8 lens.

Now I am going to be on a long-term hunt for the white and silver version of the prime lenses, especially the fisheye, and if I get along with the NX 500 (I have a feeling I will adore it) I might look at the few zoom lenses and the larger prime lenses.
PXL_20250120_110256780.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

I still love my Little Q and will keep using it but I know that one day the battery will die and the Q will become a permanent decoration, so I hope the NX 500 will keep going for a long time. (And I don't think I will get any of the rangefinder-style Micro Four Thirds cameras anymore because they don't offer anything more then what NX 500 already does, flippy screen but no IBIS, flippy screen with IBIS but a lot bigger and heavier (Pen-F and GX8), small but no EVF, EVF but bigger but no flippy screen, etc).
 
So this one is a *re-*acquisition for me: an Exc+ Fuji X-Pro1.

I've owned X-Pro1 cameras since they first came out in 2012 - the first one ordered immediately upon release. I've had at least one (and for a while two) almost ever since. Recently I went looking for my sole remaining one in my gear locker, but after not finding it, remembered that I had passed it to a friend a couple years back. In a fit of nostalgia, a few weeks ago I took a look at the current market for these. Wow, used ones are now selling for about double what they were just some 2-3 years ago! So I gave up on that pretty quickly.

Then, I stumbled on one that was priced rather low. The seller noted that he'd acquired it in a trade just a short time ago, didn't gel with it, but it had a scratched LCD so he was letting it go for a low price. However, looking at the photos I realized something that someone not familiar with the model might not: the LCD on the X-Pro1 has a pretty deep frame around it, with the LCD itself rather inset compared to a lot of cameras. That is, the LCD had a screen protector on it, but the protector was flush with the frame - it didn't protrude, and was very evenly positioned - so it would appear to not have one. The screen protector definitely had a mild (not bad, really) scratch. But was the actual LCD underneath also scratched? Was the seller referring to another underlying scratch and not the one immediately visible? Since it was priced low, I decided to gamble that it did not, pretty sure I could resell without loss if it didn't meet my expectation. The camera is otherwise "exc+" with a few marks here and there but overall very clean.

So I bought it and it arrived last weekend. Sure enough, prying up the screen protector with a bit of dental floss showed a pristine actual LCD underneath! And the camera works perfectly. The light scratch on the protector really doesn't bother me, so I just pressed it back on. All in all, I ended up with a pretty nice deal on a lovely X-Pro1. I've always enjoyed the somewhat unique look and color science of the X-Trans1 sensor, and it's been fun to carry as an EDC the past several days. I'm glad to have one back in the bag.

View attachment 525033
That and the 35 1.4, photographically one could survive on just that alone.
 
I've been tempted by these old 'trashcan' Mac Pro's for some time and am pleased to see that someone else is as well. If you have any recommendations about things to get or to avoid on them, please share them. And congrats on yours!
You mainly want to avoid the D300 models, since that was an even older GPU generation than the D500 and D700. As far as CPUs go, you can go with any model if you are pretty good at tinkering, as you can buy pretty much any of the compatible Xeons off eBay for $25 or less and upgrade it yourself. Probably the ideal CPU is the E5 2667v2, which is an 8 core that tops out at 4.0GHz. The 2697v2 is 12C, but it surrenders 500MHz to the 2667v2. Most of these seem to sell with the 6C 1650v2, which isn't all that bad of a CPU option either. The Amount of RAM is also not entirely important since it's upgradeable, and you can get ECC DDR3-1866 for really cheap.

The catch you have to watch for is storage, as Apple used a proprietary drive connection here. This isn't a huge deal, as you can get an adapter card off Amazon for $9 to use regular NVME drives. However, before you can successfully use the adapter card, you have to make sure the Mac Pro's firmware is updated to the latest version. Updating the firmware isn't hard--it just involves installing Monterey (last official supported macOS version for the 6,1) and related updates, but you can't do that without an Apple-branded drive installed first. So really, you're only really taking a risk if buy a model without a drive installed. There's a decent chance the firmware will be updated, but you just never know how long one of these has been sitting. I have an old 128GB Apple drive, so I'm covered.

The last tip I have is to install MacsFanControl in the end, and set a more aggressive fan curve. Heat was ultimately the enemy of the Trash Can Mac, as the thermal core (which is basically a giant hunk of copper) can only dissipate so much heat. I beleive this was the reason Apple never upgraded off the launch models in the 6,1's 6-year run. Having the fan ramp up when you're doing something intensive just makes sense, and the fan really doesn't get all that loud unless you're maxing it out, which is unnecesary.

If you want to go beyond Monterey, download OpenCore Legacy Patcher and follow the instructions. It's a bit more adventurous, and I don't know that it's necessary. You can just install a third-party browser like FireFox or Chrome, so you have a browser that's still getting updates.

As usual, there are risks with old hardware. Something eventually has to give, but we're not talking lots of money here either. These still make decent photo editing machines, provided you don't need a lot of GPU compute power (like AI noise reduction).
 
Last edited:
Hai. So I mentioned earlier of something coming, it arrived an hour ago and a lot sooner then I expected since it's coming from Netherlands and I bought it on Saturday.

View attachment 525073
I have been itching to try the Samsung NX system for MANY MANY years since it came out but I could never really get into it because of the price and lack of IBIS. So I ignored the system and waited until it dropped in price because the system was abandoned in 2014. In the last 2 years I have noticed at CEX (local UK electronics and gaming used store) that the Samsung NX lenses go for almost dirt cheap price for what they can offer in terms of IQ and performance, here's a the list of the lenses that I am interested (though mostly on the prime lenses):
*Samsung NX 12-24mm f 4-5.6 ED: 200 £
*Samsung NX 18-200mm f 3.5-5.6 ED OIS: 215 £
*Samsung NX 50-200mm f 4-5.6 ED OIS III: 85 £
*Samsung NX S 16-50mm f 2-2.8 ED: 500 £
*Samsung NX S 50-150mm f 2.8 ED OIS: 250 £
*Samsung NX 10mm f 3.5 Fisheye Pancake: 35 £
*Samsung NX 16mm f 2.4 Pancake: 65 £
*Samsung NX 20mm f 2.8 Pancake: 75 £
*Samsung NX 30mm f 2 Pancake: 120 £
*Samsung NX 45mm f 1.8: 150 £
*Samsung NX 60mm f 2.8 ED OIS SSA Macro: 200 £
*Samsung NX 85mm f 1.4 ED SSA: 235 £

One can have all the pancake lenses for just 300 £. Most of the zooms are extremely cheap, except for the pro-oriented 16-50mm f 2-2.8, and most of them are not even that big or heavy either. Some of them come in matching white colour with my Samsung NX500 too, the 50-200mm & 10mm & 16mm & 30mm & 45mm, and the 20mm comes in black or silver only.

NOW, the reason why the system popped into my head was that I was looking to get a pocket-friendly camera with a flippy screen for selfies because I want more pictures with me and my dog this year and I was close to getting the Panasonic GF9/850/880 and seeing the prices for it on evilBay and the Samsung NX was being advertised between the search results. I looked if there are any NX xxx series that does have a flippy screen and I found 3: Samsung NX 3000, NX 300M and NX500 ... after looking through evilBay for all the models I found a seller that was selling this NX 500 with 16-50mm f 3.5-5.6 Power Zoom and 20mm f 2.8 Pancake for 300 £ from Netherlands.

View attachment 525075
Now it's not without a fault hence the attractive price BUT I was thinking: HEY I CAN FIX THAT ... it's just 2 missing screws from the hinge to the camera body, I can either find 2 size fitting screws or ask one of the phone shops that advertise repairs if they can fit 2 screws for me ... AND THAT WOULD BE ONE HELL OF A DEAL.

So I put my brain on a number crunching and the more I thought about it the more tempting it was getting. And what sealed the deal for me was that IF I can get that sexy 10mm f 3.5 Fisheye Pancake then I would have one hell of a setup for my doggie book. Of course then it means I will have 3 fisheye lenses within 3 systems with 3 different outputs BUT I think I can figure out which one to keep after I use them and compare them.

View attachment 525076
The camera works fine and I spent about 20 minutes cleaning it. I think the camera belongs to a non-photographic-oriented person because the poor NX 500 was dropped a few times and there are some dents in it, most likely on hard pavement because it took off the paint of the top aluminium plate as well as damaged the leathered cover. But it seems to be just cosmetic damage so it's not the end of the world (I am a more damaged person than my Samsung NX 500 so we belong to each other 😛 )

View attachment 525077
All the buttons and dials work fine, both lenses focus well and the OIS in the power zoom lens works well. It has a bit of a dent on the front plastic frame but it's not affecting the lens. I doubt I am going to use the power zoom lens all that much once I have the prime lenses.

View attachment 525078
View attachment 525079
The only think that has been a bit more disappointing is the crack on the tripod socket from the bottom, I can see the plastic frame being pulled out of the housing so I don't think it's safe to put it on a tripod so it doesn't cause any further stress on the socket and the bottom housing. I think at some point the camera fell down with the tripod connected to it and it stressed the housing out of it's plastic clips.

View attachment 525081
I can't wait to see what the 28 MP BIS CMOS APSC sensor can do and what colours it will render (as Samsung has a history of technology partnering with Pentax). I absolutely delighted and surprised how small and light the camera was. it's less than 300 grams and that's less than the Pany GF cameras.

View attachment 525082
View attachment 525083
View attachment 525084
Ok, it's not as small as my Pentax Q BUT damn it's so close for a sensor so much bigger. I think it's still pocketable (I don't wear skinny jeans).

View attachment 525085

View attachment 525086
The only really significant difference is the lens mount sticking out because the NX mount is the longest of all mirrorless cameras (Samsung, why?) and the lenses will stick out a bit more. But seriously, the 01 Prime is just a little bit shorter in the end compared to the pretty close Samsung NX 20mm f 2.8 lens.

Now I am going to be on a long-term hunt for the white and silver version of the prime lenses, especially the fisheye, and if I get along with the NX 500 (I have a feeling I will adore it) I might look at the few zoom lenses and the larger prime lenses.
View attachment 525087
I still love my Little Q and will keep using it but I know that one day the battery will die and the Q will become a permanent decoration, so I hope the NX 500 will keep going for a long time. (And I don't think I will get any of the rangefinder-style Micro Four Thirds cameras anymore because they don't offer anything more then what NX 500 already does, flippy screen but no IBIS, flippy screen with IBIS but a lot bigger and heavier (Pen-F and GX8), small but no EVF, EVF but bigger but no flippy screen, etc).
I can strongly recommend the 30mm its ac great little lens only one I bother to use on my NX1000
 
Hai. So I mentioned earlier of something coming, it arrived an hour ago and a lot sooner then I expected since it's coming from Netherlands and I bought it on Saturday.

View attachment 525073
I have been itching to try the Samsung NX system for MANY MANY years since it came out but I could never really get into it because of the price and lack of IBIS. So I ignored the system and waited until it dropped in price because the system was abandoned in 2014. In the last 2 years I have noticed at CEX (local UK electronics and gaming used store) that the Samsung NX lenses go for almost dirt cheap price for what they can offer in terms of IQ and performance, here's a the list of the lenses that I am interested (though mostly on the prime lenses):
*Samsung NX 12-24mm f 4-5.6 ED: 200 £
*Samsung NX 18-200mm f 3.5-5.6 ED OIS: 215 £
*Samsung NX 50-200mm f 4-5.6 ED OIS III: 85 £
*Samsung NX S 16-50mm f 2-2.8 ED: 500 £
*Samsung NX S 50-150mm f 2.8 ED OIS: 250 £
*Samsung NX 10mm f 3.5 Fisheye Pancake: 35 £
*Samsung NX 16mm f 2.4 Pancake: 65 £
*Samsung NX 20mm f 2.8 Pancake: 75 £
*Samsung NX 30mm f 2 Pancake: 120 £
*Samsung NX 45mm f 1.8: 150 £
*Samsung NX 60mm f 2.8 ED OIS SSA Macro: 200 £
*Samsung NX 85mm f 1.4 ED SSA: 235 £

One can have all the pancake lenses for just 300 £. Most of the zooms are extremely cheap, except for the pro-oriented 16-50mm f 2-2.8, and most of them are not even that big or heavy either. Some of them come in matching white colour with my Samsung NX500 too, the 50-200mm & 10mm & 16mm & 30mm & 45mm, and the 20mm comes in black or silver only.

NOW, the reason why the system popped into my head was that I was looking to get a pocket-friendly camera with a flippy screen for selfies because I want more pictures with me and my dog this year and I was close to getting the Panasonic GF9/850/880 and seeing the prices for it on evilBay and the Samsung NX was being advertised between the search results. I looked if there are any NX xxx series that does have a flippy screen and I found 3: Samsung NX 3000, NX 300M and NX500 ... after looking through evilBay for all the models I found a seller that was selling this NX 500 with 16-50mm f 3.5-5.6 Power Zoom and 20mm f 2.8 Pancake for 300 £ from Netherlands.

View attachment 525075
Now it's not without a fault hence the attractive price BUT I was thinking: HEY I CAN FIX THAT ... it's just 2 missing screws from the hinge to the camera body, I can either find 2 size fitting screws or ask one of the phone shops that advertise repairs if they can fit 2 screws for me ... AND THAT WOULD BE ONE HELL OF A DEAL.

So I put my brain on a number crunching and the more I thought about it the more tempting it was getting. And what sealed the deal for me was that IF I can get that sexy 10mm f 3.5 Fisheye Pancake then I would have one hell of a setup for my doggie book. Of course then it means I will have 3 fisheye lenses within 3 systems with 3 different outputs BUT I think I can figure out which one to keep after I use them and compare them.

View attachment 525076
The camera works fine and I spent about 20 minutes cleaning it. I think the camera belongs to a non-photographic-oriented person because the poor NX 500 was dropped a few times and there are some dents in it, most likely on hard pavement because it took off the paint of the top aluminium plate as well as damaged the leathered cover. But it seems to be just cosmetic damage so it's not the end of the world (I am a more damaged person than my Samsung NX 500 so we belong to each other 😛 )

View attachment 525077
All the buttons and dials work fine, both lenses focus well and the OIS in the power zoom lens works well. It has a bit of a dent on the front plastic frame but it's not affecting the lens. I doubt I am going to use the power zoom lens all that much once I have the prime lenses.

View attachment 525078
View attachment 525079
The only think that has been a bit more disappointing is the crack on the tripod socket from the bottom, I can see the plastic frame being pulled out of the housing so I don't think it's safe to put it on a tripod so it doesn't cause any further stress on the socket and the bottom housing. I think at some point the camera fell down with the tripod connected to it and it stressed the housing out of it's plastic clips.

View attachment 525081
I can't wait to see what the 28 MP BIS CMOS APSC sensor can do and what colours it will render (as Samsung has a history of technology partnering with Pentax). I absolutely delighted and surprised how small and light the camera was. it's less than 300 grams and that's less than the Pany GF cameras.

View attachment 525082
View attachment 525083
View attachment 525084
Ok, it's not as small as my Pentax Q BUT damn it's so close for a sensor so much bigger. I think it's still pocketable (I don't wear skinny jeans).

View attachment 525085

View attachment 525086
The only really significant difference is the lens mount sticking out because the NX mount is the longest of all mirrorless cameras (Samsung, why?) and the lenses will stick out a bit more. But seriously, the 01 Prime is just a little bit shorter in the end compared to the pretty close Samsung NX 20mm f 2.8 lens.

Now I am going to be on a long-term hunt for the white and silver version of the prime lenses, especially the fisheye, and if I get along with the NX 500 (I have a feeling I will adore it) I might look at the few zoom lenses and the larger prime lenses.
View attachment 525087
I still love my Little Q and will keep using it but I know that one day the battery will die and the Q will become a permanent decoration, so I hope the NX 500 will keep going for a long time. (And I don't think I will get any of the rangefinder-style Micro Four Thirds cameras anymore because they don't offer anything more then what NX 500 already does, flippy screen but no IBIS, flippy screen with IBIS but a lot bigger and heavier (Pen-F and GX8), small but no EVF, EVF but bigger but no flippy screen, etc).
That is great Ovi! I was intrigued by the Samsung NX series back in the day, it is too bad that this line did not continue. I like that you are going to breath some new life in this little camera that clearly has had a rough life but I am sure it will still produce wonderful images. Good luck in your lens search 👍🏻
 
Back
Top