- Location
- Central California Sierra Foothills
Congratulations.
Congratulations. Looks really good. Thats a lens i am curious about but I am worried about the weight with my nad shoulders and hand tremors.Took my newly acquired OM System 150-600 f5-6.3 IS out for it's first spin to a local bird sanctuary. First time using it, and first time in a long time photographing birds and trying to get BIFs. Used it both on a monopod and handheld. Will take some doing to get used to the size and weight. Here's a sample photo, taken handheld. Didn't get hardly any BIF photos. Way out of practice.
View attachment 543292
OM Digital Solutions OM-1
OM 150-600mm F5.0-6.3
ƒ6.3 600.0 mm 1/1250 ISO1250
Thanks! Yes, it is heavy. Two pounds heavier than my 100-400, which I thought was already heavy. But the reach this lens gives me without a teleconverter is awesome. I used it part of the time on my monopod with a Monogimbal, but had to take it off to try to get some BIFs. Ended up using it handheld most of the time, and my left arm and wrist would start aching after a while. I need to do some exercises after not having been out with a birding rig in over a year. The weight might actually help steady it for you in the face of hand tremors. The Sync-IS is great. Or, use a monopod or tripod to help steady and support it.Congratulations. Looks really good. Thats a lens i am curious about but I am worried about the weight with my nad shoulders and hand tremors.
Love your pussycat, Randy.So I stumbled upon a lens I never realized existed.
View attachment 543995
For as much as I'd like to have the 75mm 1.8 for portraits, I don't know that I'd use it enough to justify even the used cost. In comes something called the Sigma ART 60mm 2.8. It was really quite cheap at KEH, so I thought it might be worth a try. It's rather peculiar with it's smooth focus ring (which would really annoy a manual focuser, I'd imagine), and when it's off, you can hear the focus element rattling about alarmingly, but once it's powered on, it's pretty fast and it's super sharp.
View attachment 543996
And to my surprise, my beloved MCON-P02 threads onto it, turning it into a poor man's Olympus 60mm 2.8 Macro. This thing might have just gotten even more use out of me. Oh, and I also grabbed the 9mm BCL for cheap fisheye fun.
These were a nice trio of lenses, that I imagine are getting quite affordable. They made a 30mm and I want to say a 19mm? I had the widest one for a bit. It was a good lens.So I stumbled upon a lens I never realized existed.
View attachment 543995
For as much as I'd like to have the 75mm 1.8 for portraits, I don't know that I'd use it enough to justify even the used cost. In comes something called the Sigma DN "ART" 60mm 2.8. It was really quite cheap at KEH (less than half the price of a used 60 macro), so I thought it might be worth a try. It's rather peculiar with it's smooth focus ring (which would really annoy a manual focuser, I'd imagine), and when it's off, you can hear the focus element rattling about alarmingly, but once it's powered on, it's quiet, fast, and it's super sharp, even at higher ISO.
View attachment 543996
And to my surprise, my beloved MCON-P02 threads onto it, turning it into a poor man's Olympus 60mm 2.8 Macro. This thing might have just gotten even more use out of me. Oh, and I also grabbed the 9mm BCL for cheap fisheye fun.
I had both the 60mm and the 30mm back in the day; both nice lenses - the 30mm more for its rendering than its terminal sharpness (that's why I swapped it for the 30mm f/1.4 later - similar images, but 2 stops faster and visibly sharper), but the 60mm was a real gem. @Darmok N Jalad Enjoy the lens!These were a nice trio of lenses, that I imagine are getting quite affordable. They made a 30mm and I want to say a 19mm? I had the widest one for a bit. It was a good lens.
Don't be too worried about the rattling, it's built that way, it has a floating element that engages with magnets when you turn on the camera and the lens. It's an optical design to improve IQ at close focus and make focusing very fast, many lenses have it but I think Sigma just implemented a very loose floating element when not in use, you won't break the lens by shaking it.So I stumbled upon a lens I never realized existed.
View attachment 543995
For as much as I'd like to have the 75mm 1.8 for portraits, I don't know that I'd use it enough to justify even the used cost. In comes something called the Sigma DN "ART" 60mm 2.8. It was really quite cheap at KEH (less than half the price of a used 60 macro), so I thought it might be worth a try. It's rather peculiar with it's smooth focus ring (which would really annoy a manual focuser, I'd imagine), and when it's off, you can hear the focus element rattling about alarmingly, but once it's powered on, it's quiet, fast, and it's super sharp, even at higher ISO.
View attachment 543996
And to my surprise, my beloved MCON-P02 threads onto it, turning it into a poor man's Olympus 60mm 2.8 Macro. This thing might have just gotten even more use out of me. Oh, and I also grabbed the 9mm BCL for cheap fisheye fun.
I had the Sigma 19mm f 2.8 DC DN Contemporary and the 60mm f 2.8 DC DN Contemporary for a few years back when I was shooting with Pany GX-7. They are both very small, very light and very sharp lenses, also, they used to be the most affordable lenses before Yongnuo came out with their primes and even before Pany 25mm f 1.7 existed. The Sigma 60mm f 2.8 was THE SHARPEST lens on Micro Four Thirds before Olympus came out with their 75mm f 1.8, many reviews stated that emphatically:These were a nice trio of lenses, that I imagine are getting quite affordable. They made a 30mm and I want to say a 19mm? I had the widest one for a bit. It was a good lens.