Saturday morning musings. Years ago when I first got into the MILC world, I had a sequence of Sony cameras. My favorite was the NEX-6. It was plasticky and the IQ was good but not fantastic, but I loved the layout with the EVF in the upper left with a simple flip screen. Fast forward to the present, and I have an OM-5, X-A5, and X30. I like both the Fujifilm and OM color science. They also both have easy to use wireless transfer. Although it takes great images, I do not care for the articulating screen of the OM-5. I prefer the form factor of the X30, and it takes great images as long as the light is decent. The X-A5 also has nice IQ, but I do prefer having an EVF at times.
I have considered trying Sony again with an A6400, but I've read uncomplimentary comments about Sony color science and the way they implement wireless transfer. I don't know if those comments are valid, but it's enough to give me pause. Even if I did get an A6400, I would simply get a TT Artisan 27mm AF lens, but no Sony native lenses.
If I could design any camera I wanted, it would have a body the size of the A6400, with a rangerfinder style EVF and a tilt screen, and a nice magnesium alloy body. It would be a Fuji, with Fuji menu system and controls, and I'd be perfectly happy with the X-Trans II sensor. I'd likely pair it with the upcoming 23mm pancake. Just dreaming out loud, as the only camera I know of that comes close to that is the X100V, and it is far too expensive for my "buy to try" tinkering. Used to be it was easy to find gently used cameras for $400-500 USD. So I worked my way through many Sony, Olympus, Lumix, and Fuji cameras, and I just looked at them as long term rentals. Current used camera prices have made that philosophy impractical.