- Location
- Switzerland
- Name
- Matt
Yesno. Maybe I should. But I won't. I think. I guess - oh, whatever ...Maybe you should consider the Q or Q2. Fantastic 28mm lens with a high res full frame attached.
Honestly, I'd love to own the Q2 - but I'm just not really a 28mm guy; and a Q2 is *not* a camera to have sitting around and doing nothing. And the GR III is a fantastic substitute - if I feel the 28mm itch, it more than fulfills that purpose. In fact, I'd only really go for the Q2 for two things: the EVF, and sealing. That's not worth north of $4500 over the GR III to me - at least not yet. However, if Leica ever takes a page out of Ricoh's book and presented a Q2"x" (35mm or longer), I'll be in immediate "shut up and take my money" mode. That's why the GR IIIx is still calling, in spite of the very satisfying Z fc/28mm SE combo and the upcoming Z 40mm f/2, and my latest addition we both share now, the APO-Lanthar (man, that's one huge GAS killer ...). I'll pounce on the Z 40mm next (literally - I'll try to get one on its first day of sale to maybe use it during SiO, at least as a second option) - we'll see if it can silence the sirene call of the Ricoh ...
M.