L0n3Gr3yW0lf
Hall of Famer
- Location
- Somerset, UK
- Name
- Ovi
From Olympus I'm going by memory of almost 2 years of usage (so it's not just my capability) with E-M1 Mark III and Oly 100-400mm. Since I got the Sony a7 IV my hitrate on both in focus and right moment has increased dramatically, most of my misses are slow reactions of mine, bad AF choices (like AF size or type) or bad exposure settings.I don’t have any pets, so I’m no help there. For people, the A1 is probably a bit better, but that is anecdotal, I am not disappointed by the OM-1 for people eye AF if that makes sense. In fact the EM1 MK III has very good people eye AF, again IMHO. For birds and animals, I have found that the OM-1 finds the eye just a little bit faster than the A1 but the A1 is stickier. For all of the various AF modes, we are splitting hairs when it comes to these two bodies. The OM-1 wins for me as a total package, size, weight, AF performance, system lens quality and built in features. I do occasionally still use my PL 100-400 and it is very snappy with the OM-1, no issues for me.
In the image below, the OM-1 will quickly find the eye and ignore the foliage. I can confidently raise the camera, point in the direction of the animal, and by the time my eye reaches the EVF, I can do a half press to confirm focus and take the shot. The camera is definitely faster than me and is ready and waiting. But so is the Sony and that is why I always try to make it clear that for me, I enjoy the OM-1 and my other Olympus bodies much more than the Sony’s that I have and have had. Sony images are sharp/crisp with lots of DR but Olympus is very capable and in many ways out paces Sony. Throw in some denoise software and the differences are tiny between the 2. There is no perfect camera but we are getting closer, one just needs to find what is most comfortable for their use.View attachment 389740
With the E-M1 I was struggling to get the focus and keeping up with the subject especially in low light (forests, foliage, shade, early morning and late evenings).
With E-M1 Human Eye AF was spotty as well, with Oly 12-40mm, Pany 15mm f 1.7, 25mm f 1.7 and 42.5mm f 1.7, getting low hitrate of in focus mostly indoors and low light. I was using Single Small AF point with the Joystick but it wasn't sticking nor was it accurate (with AF priority). It was frustrating to photograph the residence at my workplace when I got 1 to 3 decent but not great images per burst. Using it with my dog was a complete failure of accuracy and with my late girlfriend's 1 year old niece it would fail me 4 out of 5 tries/bursts when she was in motion.
In the winter I tried a few portraits indoors with all our lights on, getting 1/125th at f 1.7 and ISO 4000-6400 the IQ was difficult to edit, it had desaturated colours, plastic skin rendition and the textures would bleed in (like skin, clothes, hair). Denoising helped with the noise but not with the loss of details and colours ... Or maybe I'm to picking about? Dunno.
But I admit that I do miss certain features limited (mostly) to Olympus, Pro Capture because I love shooting birds taking off and landing or hunting or fighting each other, Focus Bracketing and Stacking and the DoF for macro, Live Composite and Bulb, 3 to 10 seconds Hand Held, WR piece of mind, the weight and size of Pany 50-200mm and Oly 100-400mm, the ultra fast 1/2 switching I had for still life HHHR and fast Pro Cap for wildlife, no dust on the sensor and the silver E-M5s and silver lenses.
But all I need to do to get the Olympus or any other brand out of my mind is to go out with my Sony and get my socks blown off by the AF and get home and get my clothes blown off by the latitude of RAW editing posibilities and f 2.8/1.8 FF DoF.