Throwback to 2012 when I, too, had a Nikon 1 V1!
As I recall, I was hunting for something to complement my then new M9. Something to use with either very wide or very long lenses, but also to carry around daily. V1 wasn't quite it: while small, it didn't feel any in a bag than the M9, and the adapters I bought for my M/F-mount lenses were pretty low quality to put it kindly. And it got HOT while shooting. Mere months later the V1 gave way to Olympus E-M5.
But now I suddenly feel the itch again!
View attachment 371148
I've never had the V1 get hot while shooting - but I switch cameras off after each shot, usually. Other than that, I still find that camera to be surprisingly usable over ten years after its release. It's one of the few cameras that, once you've wrapped your head around it, just works - somewhat fiddly in some respects, but very straightforward on the whole (in aperture priority, that is). Switch on (it's quick!), look through viewfinder, maybe adjust aperture, focus using center point (it's a 1" camera - no need to fiddle with AF points), reframe, press shutter, done - in well under five seconds, almost film-like (I've also switched off the rear screen entirely). Once in a while, I need exposure compensation (fiddly!), but that's about it. Pity you can't switch off image review, though. Still, a great visual notebook, especially with the 18.5mm f/1.8 lens (a gem - even if it's a bit bigger than I'd like). But of course, my current camera for that purpose is much, much better in *every* way: the Fujifilm X100V.
Low light performance on the V1 is better than on the M8 ... but that's not a fair comparison, and the *images* coming from the M8's sensor in good light are much, much nicer to my eye. However, realistically, shooting higher than ISO 800 (V1) or ISO 640 (M8) makes for a noisy mess on both cameras - though I sometimes convert ISO 1250 files from the M8 to high contrast b&w; that works visually, but don't expect detailed files.
M.