Hi All,
I have been using Nikon for 3 years, recently decided to sell as I just wasn't using it enough (casual photographer!).
Read up a lot as was missing it, then stumbled upon Fuji X. Went for the X-A2 with the XC 16-50 and XC50-230. I have just added the XF27 as well.
Have to say, blown away. My D3200 was good and I had some decent glass but it always took quite a bit of PP (I am not too bad in LR) to get really stunning pics. The FUJI JPEGs are something else. I also note the lack of noise at ISO3200+...My D3200 managed maybe 1600 before significant noise...
Anyway, seems like a lot steer away from the X-A2, but I don't mind the lack of VF...and all the lenses are fantastic.
Cheers, I'll look forward to contributing!
A couple - one with the XC50-230 and the other with the XC16-50
I have been using Nikon for 3 years, recently decided to sell as I just wasn't using it enough (casual photographer!).
Read up a lot as was missing it, then stumbled upon Fuji X. Went for the X-A2 with the XC 16-50 and XC50-230. I have just added the XF27 as well.
Have to say, blown away. My D3200 was good and I had some decent glass but it always took quite a bit of PP (I am not too bad in LR) to get really stunning pics. The FUJI JPEGs are something else. I also note the lack of noise at ISO3200+...My D3200 managed maybe 1600 before significant noise...
Anyway, seems like a lot steer away from the X-A2, but I don't mind the lack of VF...and all the lenses are fantastic.
Cheers, I'll look forward to contributing!
A couple - one with the XC50-230 and the other with the XC16-50