• Cameraderie, a friendly photography forum for photographers and camera enthusiasts!
    If you are looking for critique, tips, advice, buying recommendations, or just want to talk to fellow enthusiasts then join now for free!

Fuji I figured out LR sharpening

I have been playing around with the current version of LR classic to see if I could lose the worm artifacts. And I think I figured it out. The issue lies in the detail slider. Keeping it at 0 seems to do the trick. This is shot at iso 200. The settings were
Sharpening
Amount 75
Radius 1
Detail 0
Masking 44
Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 

gryphon1911

All-Pro
Feb 6, 2015
1,025
Central Ohio, USA
This is interesting. I've read other articles that claim that the AMOUNT slider in LR coupled with the demosaicing algorithm was the culprit. They recommended using low AMOUNT and all DETAIL with a MASKING around 45 and RADIUS of 0.7.

I've tested this with good results.

Perhaps there is more than one way to skin this cat. I'll definitely be investigating this approach as well. It could be that both have merit depending on the type of image and the ISO.
 

nippa

Top Veteran
Aug 7, 2010
629
Cheshire UK
I've read other articles that claim that the AMOUNT slider in LR coupled with the demosaicing algorithm was the culprit. They recommended using low AMOUNT and all DETAIL with a MASKING around 45 and RADIUS of 0.7.

I've tested this with good results.
When I can't be bothered to use Iridient X Transformer I use similar LR settings to those published earlier to achieve decent results.

For me the key is in the detail slider staying high which I read means high deconvolution....the secret behind Focus Magic my all time favourite sharpener.
 
This is interesting. I've read other articles that claim that the AMOUNT slider in LR coupled with the demosaicing algorithm was the culprit. They recommended using low AMOUNT and all DETAIL with a MASKING around 45 and RADIUS of 0.7.

I've tested this with good results.

Perhaps there is more than one way to skin this cat. I'll definitely be investigating this approach as well. It could be that both have merit depending on the type of image and the ISO.
I gave these settings a try. And the results were really really close to the settings I used above. Nearly indistinguishable. So there are two ways around the worm issue.
 

gryphon1911

All-Pro
Feb 6, 2015
1,025
Central Ohio, USA
I gave these settings a try. And the results were really really close to the settings I used above. Nearly indistinguishable. So there are two ways around the worm issue.
So it sounds like the moral of the story is that you should use either amount or detail, but never both.

Interesting. Thanks for taking the time to do a side by side of the two methods.
 

Latest posts

Latest threads

Top Bottom