Herman
The Image Stimulator
- Location
- The Netherlands
- Name
- Herman
But doesn't the lens droop? And it needs the new sensor.X-S1 has a bigger sensor, probably better sealing/build quality, manual zoom.
FZ200 has constant f2.8, and is quite a big lighter.
X-S1 has a bigger sensor, probably better sealing/build quality, manual zoom.
FZ200 has constant f2.8, and is quite a big lighter.
But doesn't the lens droop?
The X-S1 has lens droop in some cameras. I've also read that some feel that it doesn't seem to affect sharpness, but I'd take that with a grain of salt. I'm in the market for a bridge camera to replace my m43 kit. I'm just tired of carrying around a whole slew of lenses when I go on vacation. The Fuji and the Panasonic are the 2 that I have zeroed in on.
Oly makes a 14-150mm lens, Panny has a similar one. So perhaps m4/3 is still a go'er?
Thanks for the suggestion Lili. Once you've tasted of the 300mm (600mm effective) goodness, it's hard to give up the ultrareach. And just having the option to add extra lenses will mean I will buy more. I'm really enjoying just shooting at "normal" focal lengths and appreciating the IQ of an APS-C sensor. Since that will be for my "serious" photography, I'm willing to accept an IQ hit for my "tourist" photography.
Maybe Sony will make a superzoom with the sensor in the new RX100.
So, Luke, what are you using for your "serious" Photography. Somewhere along the way, I missed the transition.I'm really enjoying just shooting at "normal" focal lengths and appreciating the IQ of an APS-C sensor. Since that will be for my "serious" photography, I'm willing to accept an IQ hit for my "tourist" photography.