mesmerized
Regular
Dear Users,
I've just come across this review of X-T2: Fuji X-T2 Review
This is what Ken Rockwell says:
Fuji X-T2 versus DSLRs
DSLRs are the workhorses of the pro industry. They give the best picture quality, widest range of lenses and fastest operation.
The reason to look at mirrorless cameras is mostly for small size and weight, but this is a big mirrorless camera, bigger than the previous model. Add the ludicrous EF-X500 flash, and it's just as big as a DSLR, but without the image quality and real-world speed.
I prefer a small DSLR like the Nikon D3300 or Canon SL1 to this X-T2, and each weighs and costs less. They don't feel as nice in-hand because they're plastic, but they work at least as well and their images are even better for nature and landscape due to their snappier color rendition.
Fuji goes off about "pro" with this camera, but it's not really. If you want small, consider a small DSLR for the best of all worlds.
While this Fuji's color is all about people, if you also do landscapes and nature, you'll do better with a DSLR.
I'm wondering what your opinions are. After all Canon SL1 is a very basic, entry-level model... So is Nikon 3300 as far as I know. Do these cameras still exceed Fuji's image quality?
Cheers
I've just come across this review of X-T2: Fuji X-T2 Review
This is what Ken Rockwell says:
Fuji X-T2 versus DSLRs
DSLRs are the workhorses of the pro industry. They give the best picture quality, widest range of lenses and fastest operation.
The reason to look at mirrorless cameras is mostly for small size and weight, but this is a big mirrorless camera, bigger than the previous model. Add the ludicrous EF-X500 flash, and it's just as big as a DSLR, but without the image quality and real-world speed.
I prefer a small DSLR like the Nikon D3300 or Canon SL1 to this X-T2, and each weighs and costs less. They don't feel as nice in-hand because they're plastic, but they work at least as well and their images are even better for nature and landscape due to their snappier color rendition.
Fuji goes off about "pro" with this camera, but it's not really. If you want small, consider a small DSLR for the best of all worlds.
While this Fuji's color is all about people, if you also do landscapes and nature, you'll do better with a DSLR.
I'm wondering what your opinions are. After all Canon SL1 is a very basic, entry-level model... So is Nikon 3300 as far as I know. Do these cameras still exceed Fuji's image quality?
Cheers