I'm glad he has found what works for him. In the past I've found his writings to be more about the gear, and the technical side of things, rather than what I would call the image making side. That's not a criticism, just an observation.
I'm not sure I entirely agree with Luke's assertion around image quality. I think it all depends on the preferred subject matter, and final output. Those that output primarily to the web certainly have a wider choice of cameras.
I admire the Nex 7. It has a lot going for it. I just don't like it. For me, it just didn't feel camera-like. It felt competent, and effective, but without any personality or presence.
The other thing I don't like about Nex is the glass (which is at least as important as the camera...). The Nex glass comes in for a lot of criticism around size. That didn't bother me too much, but the choice of focal lengths. Wow. Bizarre.
I note that he raises the X-Pro 1 focus 'issues', and it seems that since he personally experienced these issues, they must be true for everyone. For me, it doesn't have any focus issues. It won't meet everyone's needs, but that doesn't make it an issue. Nice slam at the
Fuji handling of diopters (which does seem odd), but the camera he really wants,
Leica, uses the same approach but doesn't get whacked.
Anyway, he's happy, and we have lots of choice. Cool.