Film Showcase Kodak Gold 200

derelict

Rookie
28790777333_b4d0baa599_c.jpg


29412103775_b425466cca_c.jpg


33778973520_0ca12864fe_c.jpg


34122837886_5932685fd9_c.jpg


33778974250_0c5119b63b_c.jpg


34122836616_f57faf0620_c.jpg
 
Previously erroneously posted in the Colorplus 200 thread.
Minolta Dynax 4, 28-80. Scanned at home with Vuescan and levels tidied up with Luminar Flex.
3573D660-357E-4DC9-83D1-27DC0D10B9AF.jpeg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


6449A4B0-D56A-4C52-8ACC-5E714EDF6CC7.jpeg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


529C55ED-CECB-4FF4-84EA-0156B039C0FA.jpeg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


78423361-C93E-40F0-8971-D6D6774318CA.jpeg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
 
I scanned some old negatives on the Pacific Image XAs, one thing I've noticed is that the color film profiles on that scanner produce extremely vivid colors compared to the lab colors one usually gets. But, I kinda like them.

51832076070_0574be954d_h.jpg
Untitled (15) by Andrew Lossing, on Flickr

51831695659_0a325c659f_h.jpg
Untitled (8) by Andrew Lossing, on Flickr

There's a rumor that Fujifilm's newest iteration of their 200 speed film is just good ol' Gold 200, which isn't the worst thing, though I never got to try their well-regarded C200.
 
Back
Top