Oh yeah, I remember seeing those somewhere here! Quite decent at least scaled down to internets-size.
The adapter itself isn't exactly cheap, ~300€ here in Finland, so I was wondering whether there was any point to it unless you already own a bunch of old A-mount glass. I took a quick peek at the eBay prices of some old Minolta AF lenses, and some are indeed rather affordable. Which ones of those are any good, I've no idea. I've never really had much any interest in Minolta gear, though I briefly had an SRT-101b in the film days. My grandfather had one of the single digit Dynaxes (Maxxum elsewhere) AF bodies when I was a teenager, and I didn't like the controls on that one. When I worked a summer job at a camera store, we had a Dynax 505 on the shelf, but I don't remember really playing around with that. I was more of a Nikon person back then.
But I'm more just curious than really interested in an investment here. I really hate fiddling with adapters, that's one reason I ditched the EOS R for Sony; much better native lens selection. And the 30mpix of the EOS R was already enough to bring out the softness in some of my EF mount lenses, like the EF 50/1.4 and the 85/1.8. While those were still sharp enough for the 20mpix of the 6D I had before the R, that seemed to be the upper limit of the capabilities of those film era lenses. The 50/1.4 especially was soft wide open, and had some noticeable astigmatism. Though stopped down to landscape apertures it was really sharp...
But are there any old Minolta lenses that are so special on their own as to warrant the extra cost of the adapter?
Since I have no intention of printing any of these shots in wall size murals, not sure why they'd need to be presented any larger.
The 80-200/2.8 AOP HS I just ordered for $450 is rated @ 4.88 out of 5. Comparing that to Sony's $2,000 70-200/2.8 E mount at a perfect 5, it holds up well, especially at less than 1/4 the cost. Any of the old Minolta primes, like the 600/4 are excellent, and at a few thousand dollars rather than well over $10k US. Minolta's 500/8 Reflex is very highly rated for that sort of lens.
But it's not just Old Minolta A-Mount, it's all of them. All drives from screw to in-lens, Tamron, Sigma, Sony, Minolta and all the rest. There are hundreds of them, and remember Sony was still developing A-Mount glass right up until a few years ago. Most of Sony's early glass was simply rebranded Minolta. Having said all of that, I'm not advocating them for critical photography, just for fun or the odd need. All of this old glass is still old glass. In the case of the 80-200, it's not a lens I use much, but there may be a need for it if I get stuck out at the track at night. I didn't want to spend $2k for a lens that won't see much use so this is a viable alternative. There too, I'm not a prime shooter. I have one in E-Mount, a 35/1.4. The adapter lets me use the Minolta 50/1.7 for those few times I'll want one.
If you've never visited the Dyxum lens database, you should. You can browse, search, look at user reviews, image samples, internet lens reviews from places like Munger, Ephotozine, Rockwell, etc. Lenses are ranked by sharpness, flare control, color, build, etc., then the rankings are averaged. They even put an eBay link on each page that takes you to a search for that lens so you can see the going prices. It's a valuable resource for anyone looking for info on both A and E mount lenses.
Dyxum lens guide provides information about most lenses ever released for Minolta and Sony Alpha system (A-mount and E-mount DSLR, SLT, and ILC cameras)
www.dyxum.com