Well done. I have a theory - I think it’s the Zeiss lenses. I also think it’s something one can’t fully appreciate until one’s actually using then and editing the images they produce. I don’t have it (too big for me), and this honestly isn’t a gas inducing attempt, but the Distagon 35mm F1.4 is apparently “the” one out of all the Zeiss lenses optically speaking. Doesn’t really matter though; they’re all fantastic.
While I agree concerning the merits of the Distagon, it's also a huge and heavy lens - it's not too bad in terms of handling, but definitely awkward. Still, optically, it's fabulous, and its internal focusing design is quite unique (not in the sense that there are no other lenses that use it, but it's rare in manual focus lenses of its vintage). You have to really want its advantages to lug it around, and the C Biogon isn't far behind optically, which is, in my book, the greater feat than a "no compromise" lens at three times the price and twice the size and weight. That said, I'm hang on to the Distagon - it's a wonderful lens, especially for people shots.
However, at the moment, the Distagon rests in its pouch - I think the small Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f/1.5 Aspherical does a
lot right; it's no Distagon, but a fine lens for its size and price, way better than it has any right to be. Plus it offers a shorter MFD. Progress comes in small packages ...
M.
P.S. Weather allows for slower lenses today - so I'm taking the TTArtisan 28mm f/5.6; it's already fun to pack the lens - it's hardly there ...