Wouldn't expect anything lessIt does high contrast B & W nicely
What I learned about the GRII and prior models was that the mono files out of camera were fantastic but still fantastic after applying PP.I processed the same original photograph taken with my little GRDiii in two different monochrome methods - and am trying to make up my mind which I prefer, and why. Both were processed in the standalone (non-subscription) version of Lightroom I use (LR6), and in each I used a different tool from the old (freeware) Nik processing suite of plug-ins.
This first was processed using the Analog Efex plug-in---
View attachment 224036
The second was processed using Silver Efex---
View attachment 224037
I'm curious what other people think...?
I prefer the first one, mainly because it reminds me more of Ilford HP5 whereas the second has the brighter highlights of Tri-X, that's just a personal preference however.
What I learned about the GRII and prior models was that the mono files out of camera were fantastic but still fantastic after applying PP.
I prefer the second one. Primarily because there is less vignetting.I processed the same original photograph taken with my little GRDiii in two different monochrome methods - and am trying to make up my mind which I prefer, and why. Both were processed in the standalone (non-subscription) version of Lightroom I use (LR6), and in each I used a different tool from the old (freeware) Nik processing suite of plug-ins.
This first was processed using the Analog Efex plug-in---
View attachment 224036
The second was processed using Silver Efex---
View attachment 224037
I'm curious what other people think...?