It's kinda sloppy with things such as "The lens is an excellent performer, with the f/1.8 maximum aperture making both shooting in low light easier and giving you the option to create great shallow depth of field effects." My X20 does not have an f1.8 lens. It has an f2.0 lens.
Your X20 only has the f2.0 lens? The reviewer must have the premium X20 A bit sloppy yes, such as naming the lower equivalent focal but not the upper. A few edits definitely needed.
But overall I thought a pretty darned good review in short order. I especially liked the resolution versus ISO graphics for such a quickly published review. Not entirely accurate from camera to camera, but definitely indicative of resolution versus ISO performance that the camera has. I also liked the run-down of the features in-use, some of which I've missed so-far.