Menu
Home
Photography Forums
Buy, Sell & Trade
Featured Photos
Media Gallery
Resources
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Buy & Sell
Buy, Sell & Trade
Cameraderie Affiliate Vendors!
Support Cameraderie
Affiliate Vendors
Become a subscriber!
Log in
Register
Back
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Cameraderie
, a friendly photography forum,
join now for free!
Home
Forums
Photography Gear
Micro Four Thirds
Olympus E-M10 - The new GF1 !!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoonMind" data-source="post: 211800" data-attributes="member: 5637"><p>I may have exaggerated, but I'm actually pretty sure that in a purely technical comparison, that'd be the case. However, I absolutely love the images coming from the E-M10 and don't have any desire to get an A6000. But I've seen results of actual scenes from both cameras side by side (actually, dpreview.com and dkamera.de do offer that, too), and it was pretty obvious how much better the A6000 RAW files were *in absolute terms*, i.e. in every technical aspect, resolution, contrast, dynamic range, noise, whatever. Does this mean that the IQ of the E-M10 is bad? Not at all - it's actually pretty amazing, considering the size of the sensor. It's just that the Sony 24Mpix sensor is really, really good - and not marginally, but clearly better than the E-M10's. But the Olympus' RAW files offer a lot of latitude, too, and the JPEGs are nice, too. I'm more than happy with that - and as I've said, in terms of handling, the E-M10 beats the A6000 for me hands down. And yes, the E-M10 handles better than my Nikon D90, too - though not as clearly as compared to the Sony ...</p><p></p><p>M.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoonMind, post: 211800, member: 5637"] I may have exaggerated, but I'm actually pretty sure that in a purely technical comparison, that'd be the case. However, I absolutely love the images coming from the E-M10 and don't have any desire to get an A6000. But I've seen results of actual scenes from both cameras side by side (actually, dpreview.com and dkamera.de do offer that, too), and it was pretty obvious how much better the A6000 RAW files were *in absolute terms*, i.e. in every technical aspect, resolution, contrast, dynamic range, noise, whatever. Does this mean that the IQ of the E-M10 is bad? Not at all - it's actually pretty amazing, considering the size of the sensor. It's just that the Sony 24Mpix sensor is really, really good - and not marginally, but clearly better than the E-M10's. But the Olympus' RAW files offer a lot of latitude, too, and the JPEGs are nice, too. I'm more than happy with that - and as I've said, in terms of handling, the E-M10 beats the A6000 for me hands down. And yes, the E-M10 handles better than my Nikon D90, too - though not as clearly as compared to the Sony ... M. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Photography Gear
Micro Four Thirds
Olympus E-M10 - The new GF1 !!
This site uses cookies to help personalize content and to keep you logged in when you join. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom