Grokgod
Regular
I'm very curious to hear anyone's opinion on how different versions of the RX1, the original and the mark 2 render.
I had the original RX1 until recently and loved it.
Sold it to get the new version but...
I find the RX1 to be very different than the new mark 2
I find the R2 to be rather sterile.
Some photos seem TOO sharp, while others are ok but seem to be missing some of the POP of the original.
I would love to buy the R2 for all the upgrades.
But I have a special project that just needs that special sauce.
Am I deluded?
Is there some merit to what my eyes see?
Can the AA filter be used to create less aggressive details?
Or do many users over sharpen the R2?
Is the POP missing?
Or is the 42 mp sensor just not up to the original rendering style.
Love hear some ideas on the subject.
I had the original RX1 until recently and loved it.
Sold it to get the new version but...
I find the RX1 to be very different than the new mark 2
I find the R2 to be rather sterile.
Some photos seem TOO sharp, while others are ok but seem to be missing some of the POP of the original.
I would love to buy the R2 for all the upgrades.
But I have a special project that just needs that special sauce.
Am I deluded?
Is there some merit to what my eyes see?
Can the AA filter be used to create less aggressive details?
Or do many users over sharpen the R2?
Is the POP missing?
Or is the 42 mp sensor just not up to the original rendering style.
Love hear some ideas on the subject.
Last edited: