Menu
Home
Photography Forums
Buy, Sell & Trade
Featured Photos
Media Gallery
Resources
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Buy & Sell
Buy, Sell & Trade
Completed Transactions
Hot Deals!
Cameraderie Affiliate Vendors!
Support Cameraderie
Affiliate Vendors
Become a subscriber!
Log in
Register
Back
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Cameraderie
, a friendly photography forum,
join now for free!
Home
Forums
Photography Gear
Other Gear
Personal gear review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mike3996" data-source="post: 399651" data-attributes="member: 13646"><p> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>⤹</strong></span>Nikon Df and optical view might not be for me.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>⤹</strong></span>Mirrorless FF is great: 95% of Df's high-ISO capability and adaptability combined with wysiwyg exposure and stabilization.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>⤹</strong></span>No mirrorless FF camera really tickles my fancy. All have their flaws and unknowns.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>⤹</strong></span>The one mirrorless camera that does tickle, despite not being FF: Pana G9. The major selling point: the lightweight M4/3 lenses. <span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"><= MIKE IS AGAIN HERE</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>⤹</strong></span>M4/3 lenses are quite expensive after all, when put against legacy SLR lenses.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>⤹</strong></span>Nikon Df is the best platform (DSLR with automatic aperture stopdown) that can take pre-Ai lenses</li> </ul><p></p><p>And the cycle it keeps repeating... So funny in a way.</p><p></p><p>Last week I was all about Z6: affordable, cool, compact. Then on Saturday I turned towards S5 because I think it's a better fit, software-wise: over night it transformed into this magical box of perfection that'll do everything for me. And then come Monday I started to realize it's still a digital computer that simply won't offer me the fun factor of Leica M so why bother, at that cost (€2k+).</p><p></p><p>M4/3 is inherently digital platform so digitality matters less. And the lenses weigh so much less. And the picture doesn't threaten my Leica M.</p><p></p><p>Give it a couple of days and I start to realize again how the M4/3 lenses cost a fortune compared to (D)SLR lenses and I get back to Df or Z6 or S5.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mike3996, post: 399651, member: 13646"] [LIST] [*][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]⤹[/B][/COLOR]Nikon Df and optical view might not be for me. [*][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]⤹[/B][/COLOR]Mirrorless FF is great: 95% of Df's high-ISO capability and adaptability combined with wysiwyg exposure and stabilization. [*][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]⤹[/B][/COLOR]No mirrorless FF camera really tickles my fancy. All have their flaws and unknowns. [*][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]⤹[/B][/COLOR]The one mirrorless camera that does tickle, despite not being FF: Pana G9. The major selling point: the lightweight M4/3 lenses. [COLOR=rgb(251, 160, 38)]<= MIKE IS AGAIN HERE[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]⤹[/B][/COLOR]M4/3 lenses are quite expensive after all, when put against legacy SLR lenses. [*][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]⤹[/B][/COLOR]Nikon Df is the best platform (DSLR with automatic aperture stopdown) that can take pre-Ai lenses [/LIST] And the cycle it keeps repeating... So funny in a way. Last week I was all about Z6: affordable, cool, compact. Then on Saturday I turned towards S5 because I think it's a better fit, software-wise: over night it transformed into this magical box of perfection that'll do everything for me. And then come Monday I started to realize it's still a digital computer that simply won't offer me the fun factor of Leica M so why bother, at that cost (€2k+). M4/3 is inherently digital platform so digitality matters less. And the lenses weigh so much less. And the picture doesn't threaten my Leica M. Give it a couple of days and I start to realize again how the M4/3 lenses cost a fortune compared to (D)SLR lenses and I get back to Df or Z6 or S5. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Photography Gear
Other Gear
Personal gear review
This site uses cookies to help personalize content and to keep you logged in when you join. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom
