That's been my evolution as well so I'm not all that surprised.
I suspect that folks that shoot stills exclusively will become a niche, much like shooting film exclusively or black & white exclusively.
The world is changing. The art of storytelling is changing with it.
John, I somehow find it hard to imagine any kind of hard copy of a video of any description, be it film or digital.
It always requires some kind of third party object to view.
I realise that those objects are almost ubiquitous in the case of video, but it is still not the same as browsing a book of photos.
In spite of the melodramatic 'death of all books' brigade's rantings, I see no evidence of that actually happening.
The internet has a long way to go in that regard also. I both financially support and contribute to Wikipedia, but the finesse that exists comparing, say, the Chambers English Dictionary with the full Oxford English Dictionary, is yet to exist in any electronic form.
And that leaves aside Doctor Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language, last published in about 1812.
I have all of the above, and the nuances of differences often holds the key to the precise meaning and derivation of a particular word.
It is such nuances that the internet lacks, for the time being at least.
Judging by our local education system, the ability to read and write is a dying concept! Very sad, because even if one exclusively uses electronic media as a source of information, it helps if one can read, spell and write.
I find it very sad that putting "newmoanya" into a search engine turns up "pneumonia". And that's an extremely common condition, and a major cause of human deaths. What it says about our greatest invention, written language, is very sad indeed.