klaptastic
Regular
A few shots from Trout and Copper Lakes, from a hike this last weekend. High, but not too high, in the Cascade range of WA state.
Some from yesterday at Brooklands Museum. My new love..... Mercedes 190SL 1960. We were looking at this beautiful car when a German lady came up to chat, her husband restored this particular one and several others. She said it took about 200 hours but this doesn't sound a lot to me, perhaps something got lost in translation......
View attachment 23846
View attachment 23847
View attachment 23848
View attachment 23849
I should add that Mercedes World isn't actually part of Brooklands, they are just a few steps away and have a small track there.
I'm torn.. I just bought the RX1r and thought when I opened my first shots that I took with the RX1r I thought I would be blown away... not the case.. I need to mention that I thought it would succeed my X100T by far with image rendering and quality.. the issue I see with the RX is the clinical, digital and sterile look it produces.. the Fuji is just more natural looking in both jpeg and raw.. you can adjust the raw images of the RX all you want but it will not match the Fuji X100T for the Natural REAL life look and image feel.. Especially people shots and skin tones.. Make no mistake the Sony RX is a AWESOME camera.. just my 5 cents..
Your comments and rebuttals would be interesting and most welcome..
Sony isn't known for it's jpegs - Fuji is. So if you shoot jpegs and your taste runs towards Fuji, then no argument. But the Sony raw files, IMHO, put anything from any Fuji I've worked with to shame. Sure, they're neutral when you first pull 'em up - that's their job! But there's practically NOTHING you can't do with an RX1 raw file.I'm torn.. I just bought the RX1r and thought when I opened my first shots that I took with the RX1r I thought I would be blown away... not the case.. I need to mention that I thought it would succeed my X100T by far with image rendering and quality.. the issue I see with the RX is the clinical, digital and sterile look it produces.. the Fuji is just more natural looking in both jpeg and raw.. you can adjust the raw images of the RX all you want but it will not match the Fuji X100T for the Natural REAL life look and image feel.. Especially people shots and skin tones.. Make no mistake the Sony RX is a AWESOME camera.. just my 5 cents..
Your comments and rebuttals would be interesting and most welcome..
Thats Awesome Christilou, looks like a Fuji X100 series rendering.. <smile>