Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Penny" data-source="post: 5820" data-attributes="member: 282">And I thought I was the oldest on this forum<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/wink.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink:" title="wink&nbsp; &nbsp; :wink:" data-shortname=":wink:" /> yes I remember the Rolliflex and Yashica twin lens cameras never used one though.Using the 'belly' technique only a couple of months ago when taking a shot inside the flat of a friend dressed up for his granddaughter's wedding I had no option when using the X1 there was not enough room to get all of him in the pic: using eye level.This was ok and the pic was acceptable to him however I notice that the Sigma DP camera's have a LCD of 2.5 which I'm not sure I could use that particular camera in the same way.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" />Penny</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Penny, post: 5820, member: 282"] And I thought I was the oldest on this forum:wink: yes I remember the Rolliflex and Yashica twin lens cameras never used one though. Using the 'belly' technique only a couple of months ago when taking a shot inside the flat of a friend dressed up for his granddaughter's wedding I had no option when using the X1 there was not enough room to get all of him in the pic: using eye level. This was ok and the pic was acceptable to him however I notice that the Sigma DP camera's have a LCD of 2.5 which I'm not sure I could use that particular camera in the same way.:confused: Penny [/QUOTE]

Verification