I chose a Fuji XF10 over a GR mainly for price and dust reasons, and I prefer Fuji's jpegs over Ricoh's (I don't care for B&W). But yes, it fits in my pants pockets easily, also not a clown pant wearer here. The camera's thinner than my wallet so if I put my wallet and phone in one pocket (that does get crowded but I don't pull out either all the time), it leaves my other pocket free for the camera and this works brilliantly, makes a massive difference over my X100 in practice, much more than I anticipated. It is now the always with me camera that the X100 never quite could be. Must be the same for the GRs. And yes, having a tack sharp lens at 24mp with modern aps-c noise levels is pretty awesome.
If this GRIIIx (or a 40mm eq Fuji competitor) had been available and affordable six months ago I would've gotten that over a 28mm eq , but as I already have the XF10 now and I've become more interested in focal lengths of 50mm eq and beyond, 40mm eq just isn't enough of a differentiation from 28mm for me to justify.
I'd love to have just two small fixed focal length cameras, but they'd have to be far enough apart; basically with the longer lens being about double to shorter's focal length, or more.
If this GRIIIx (or a 40mm eq Fuji competitor) had been available and affordable six months ago I would've gotten that over a 28mm eq , but as I already have the XF10 now and I've become more interested in focal lengths of 50mm eq and beyond, 40mm eq just isn't enough of a differentiation from 28mm for me to justify.
I'd love to have just two small fixed focal length cameras, but they'd have to be far enough apart; basically with the longer lens being about double to shorter's focal length, or more.