Bokeh imo is a bit like street photography insofar as it’s subjective and there are not really any rules, we can basically make up our own, much to the annoyance of some who strongly disagree. For me, bokeh (which I don’t obsess about) is about the balls and the rendering thereof, I won’t even submit an image to the bokeh image thread on this forum unless my image has them and this is how the 50mm F1.8 renders ‘em.
My lens for this challenge has performed great but here we see the reason why it’s $50, even though I reckon it’s just as sharp and blurs the background just as well as the $2k 58mm f1.4 Nikkor. Can you imagine how magnificent those balls would look if I was using that latter lens? I can and I’ve never even owned or used it. And here we come to the big question - whether we value that bokeh enough to pay up to 40 times more. Doesn’t make logical sense does it and yet sometimes we still do it.
View attachment 219904