Sort of like casting Russel Crowe as Javert?
(Sorry I've just been waiting for the right time to call out that ... dubious casting decision, and here it presented itself.)
And how is that working for Pentax?
Again, if it's driven by DEMAND, that's fine -- but I'm not convinced it is. I think it's panic in levels of the company that don't design the cameras. "We've got to do SOMETHING to get/increase profits!"
If it's the demand driven, it's healthy. If it's management driven, it's not.
Sort of like casting Russel Crowe as Javert?
(Sorry I've just been waiting for the right time to call out that ... dubious casting decision, and here it presented itself.)
I don't agree with your dichotomy. Market push isn't necessarily a bad thing, and market pull (i.e. demand expressed by consumers) isn't necessarily a holy grail.
There are case where a company's attempt to "force" a trend is indeed bad (see the wide screen on your laptop? It's been pushed by the manufacturers just so they could save money; they attempted to justify that by going all "wooow now you can watch movies without black bars!!!!") and others where it isn't (Goolge's push for customisation on its Motorola X does make sense and has been well received AFAIK).
I'm so out of touch. I don't know who either one is.
God forbid that car makers start offering blue cars. Very bad sign, as we all know that real drivers only want black or white cars.
ALTHOUGH... I should probably change the color of the X in my avatar, huh?... lol
But I don't know what your disagreeing with exactly. I was speculating about how it could be a bad sign. Your speculating that it might not be. We don't know do we? With the state of the camera market, there is more than a possibility that it IS a bad sign as upper management churns out dictates to try to force profitability.
I've worked for large corporations and that sort of thing is not at all uncommon and I can't imagine it's not POSSIBLE in the camera industry.
My dichotomy stands, even it it was not complete to your satisfaction. Market driven changes are almost always good; while marketing driven changes from desperate executives are USUALLY bad. That's what I was saying and you've certainly no sound refutation.
:tiphat:like the officer said, 'back to your homes people, nothin to see here'. ):