I know some people may see the thread title and think that I found an article knocking on the GFXr. But this is quite the contrary. The GFXr looks to be a phenomenal camera. And in fact, this article is not specifically about the GFXr. But there are a lot of photos in the article taken with the GFXr. Accompanied by photos taken with a x100f.
The thing with this article. Is that these are the types of photos I tend to take. Mainly candids of people. If the author had not specified which shots were taken with which camera. Nor had he left the exif data. I would not be able to tell which photos were taken with which camera. Which tells me I have the camera I need for what and how I shoot. GFXr lust is 100% a massive case of g.a.s. which my wallet would rather not cure.
When the floor dust settles
The thing with this article. Is that these are the types of photos I tend to take. Mainly candids of people. If the author had not specified which shots were taken with which camera. Nor had he left the exif data. I would not be able to tell which photos were taken with which camera. Which tells me I have the camera I need for what and how I shoot. GFXr lust is 100% a massive case of g.a.s. which my wallet would rather not cure.
When the floor dust settles